andreybokhanko created this revision.
andreybokhanko added reviewers: rnk, majnemer, thakis.
andreybokhanko added a subscriber: cfe-commits.
This is exactly same patch as http://reviews.llvm.org/D19654 (already reviewed
and LGTMed by majnemer), with a couple of changes to fix PR27666:
* __unalig
andreybokhanko updated this revision to Diff 56874.
andreybokhanko added a comment.
Patch updated to address David's comments.
Yours,
Andrey
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20103
Files:
include/clang/AST/Type.h
include/clang/Basic/AddressSpaces.h
include/clang/Basic/Attr.td
include/clang/Basi
andreybokhanko marked 3 inline comments as done.
andreybokhanko added a comment.
In http://reviews.llvm.org/D20103#425855, @majnemer wrote:
> Can we test pointers to data members? Is it possible to have `__unaligned int
> *S::*` or `int *S::* __unaligned` or even `__unaligned int *S::* __unalign
majnemer accepted this revision.
majnemer added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM, thanks!
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20103
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL269220: [MSVC] Implementation of __unaligned as a proper
type qualifier (authored by asbokhan).
Changed prior to commit:
http://reviews.llvm.org/D20103?vs=56874&id=56945#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
http
majnemer added a comment.
Can we test pointers to data members? Is it possible to have `__unaligned int
*S::*` or `int *S::* __unaligned` or even `__unaligned int *S::* __unaligned` ?
Comment at: include/clang/AST/Type.h:446
@@ -437,1 +445,3 @@
+ // U qualifier may su
