mehdi_amini added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30514#690702, @jroelofs wrote:
> In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30514#690318, @mehdi_amini wrote:
>
> > LGTM.
> >
> > (It seems that having libc++ and libc++abi in the same repo would help
> > sharing code like this)
>
>
> I think it would
jroelofs added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D30514#690318, @mehdi_amini wrote:
> LGTM.
>
> (It seems that having libc++ and libc++abi in the same repo would help
> sharing code like this)
I think it would be a step backwards in terms of opening things up for layering
violations. We
mehdi_amini accepted this revision.
mehdi_amini added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM.
(It seems that having libc++ and libc++abi in the same repo would help sharing
code like this)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D30514
