ldionne added inline comments.
Comment at:
libcxx/trunk/test/std/thread/thread.mutex/thread.lock/thread.lock.shared/lit.local.cfg:1
+if 'availability' in config.available_features:
+config.unsupported = True
mehdi_amini wrote:
> thakis wrote:
> > Did you mea
mehdi_amini marked an inline comment as done.
mehdi_amini added subscribers: ldionne, Bigcheese.
mehdi_amini added inline comments.
Comment at:
libcxx/trunk/test/std/thread/thread.mutex/thread.lock/thread.lock.shared/lit.local.cfg:1
+if 'availability' in config.available_feature
thakis added inline comments.
Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, jdoerfert, jfb, christof.
Herald added a reviewer: serge-sans-paille.
Herald added a project: LLVM.
Comment at:
libcxx/trunk/test/std/thread/thread.mutex/thread.lock/thread.lock.shared/lit.local.cfg:1
+if 'ava
bcain added a comment.
I think some of the `XFAIL: availability` may be wrong here. I'd submit a
patch, but it's not clear to me what the appropriate fix is.
Comment at: libcxx/trunk/utils/libcxx/test/config.py:400
+if self.use_system_cxx_lib or self.with_availability
dexonsmith accepted this revision.
dexonsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
This LGTM, and it's liable to bitrot if it hangs out here any longer. We can
always iterate in tree if we find a better way to organize the markup and/or
tests.
Eric and Marshall: do
mehdi_amini added a comment.
@mclow.lists you mentioned on IRC you may have some suggestions to make this
less noisy? Do you still plan to review?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.
mehdi_amini added a comment.
@mclow.lists you mentioned on IRC you may have some suggestions to make this
less noisy? Do you still plan to review?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.
jroelofs added inline comments.
Comment at: utils/libcxx/test/config.py:387
+self.config.available_features.add(
+'with_system_cxx_lib=%s' % component)
mehdi_amini wrote:
> jroelofs wrote:
> > Is it worth filtering out `none`
mehdi_amini marked 5 inline comments as done.
mehdi_amini added inline comments.
Comment at: utils/libcxx/test/config.py:289
+def configure_availability(self):
+# FIXME doc
+self.with_availability = self.get_lit_bool('with_availability', False)
---
arphaman added inline comments.
Comment at: include/__config:1160
+
+#endif // _LIBCPP_CONFIG
Redundant whitespace added?
Comment at: utils/libcxx/test/config.py:358
+def add_deployement_feature(self, feature):
+(arch, name, vers
jroelofs added inline comments.
Comment at: utils/libcxx/test/config.py:289
+def configure_availability(self):
+# FIXME doc
+self.with_availability = self.get_lit_bool('with_availability', False)
Can you expand on what the FIXME here wants? Is
mehdi_amini added a comment.
Ping?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D31739
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
12 matches
Mail list logo