dcoughlin added a comment.
Committed in r308242. Thanks Dominik!
Repository:
rL LLVM
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes.
Closed by commit rL308242: [analyzer] Add missing documentation for static
analyzer checkers (authored by dcoughlin).
Changed prior to commit:
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645?vs=106184&id=106989#toc
Repository:
rL LLVM
szdominik added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645#806852, @dcoughlin wrote:
> Do you have commit access, or do you need someone to commit it for you?
Thank you.
I don't have, I'm quite new at this project. :)
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645
_
dcoughlin accepted this revision.
dcoughlin added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
LGTM. Thanks!
Do you have commit access, or do you need someone to commit it for you?
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645
___
cfe-commits mail
szdominik updated this revision to Diff 106184.
szdominik marked 9 inline comments as done.
szdominik added a comment.
Update with more idiomatic examples (from @dcoughlin).
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645
Files:
www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html
www/analyzer/available_checks.html
www/analyz
szdominik added a comment.
In https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645#805920, @dcoughlin wrote:
> Who is the target of this documentation? Is it developers of the analyzer or
> is it end users of the analyzer? If it is end users, it is unfortunate that
> we've been just grabbing examples from the regre
dcoughlin added a comment.
Thanks for the patch. It is really great to see these documented!
Who is the target of this documentation? Is it developers of the analyzer or is
it end users of the analyzer? If it is end users, it is unfortunate that we've
been just grabbing examples from the regres
NoQ added a comment.
I think next time we should add examples of warning messages here - not just
"//warn" but how they literally may look - so that people were able to find
this page, and not doxygen/github source code, when they google up their
warning messages.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33
szdominik updated this revision to Diff 103378.
szdominik marked 3 inline comments as done.
szdominik added a comment.
Fixed alpha.core.CallAndMessageUnInitRefArg.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645
Files:
www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html
www/analyzer/available_checks.html
www/analyzer/implici
zaks.anna added inline comments.
Comment at: www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html:91
+(C, C++)
+Check for logical errors for function calls and Objective-C message
+expressions (e.g., uninitialized arguments, null function pointers,
szdominik wrote:
> zaks.anna wrote
szdominik marked 3 inline comments as done.
szdominik added inline comments.
Comment at: www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html:91
+(C, C++)
+Check for logical errors for function calls and Objective-C message
+expressions (e.g., uninitialized arguments, null function pointers,
---
szdominik updated this revision to Diff 102650.
szdominik added a comment.
Delete modeling checkers (unix.StdCLibraryFunctions, cplusplus.SelfAssignment).
Delete unix.MallocWithAnnotations.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645
Files:
www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html
www/analyzer/available_checks.h
zaks.anna added a comment.
Great cleanup! Some comments below.
Comment at: www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html:91
+(C, C++)
+Check for logical errors for function calls and Objective-C message
+expressions (e.g., uninitialized arguments, null function pointers,
fo
szdominik created this revision.
Some checks did not have documentation in the www/analyzer/ folder, and also
some alpha checks became non-alpha.
https://reviews.llvm.org/D33645
Files:
www/analyzer/alpha_checks.html
www/analyzer/available_checks.html
www/analyzer/implicit_checks.html
In
14 matches
Mail list logo
