rsmith marked an inline comment as done.
rsmith added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/ASTNodeTraverser.h:391-392
+if (const Expr *TRC = D->getTrailingRequiresClause())
+ Visit(TRC);
+
It would be better to do this before we visit t
rsmith added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaTemplateDeduction.cpp:3440-3447
+ // C++2a [temp.deduct]p5
+ // [...] When all template arguments have been deduced [...] all uses of
+ // template parameters [...] are replaced with the corresponding deduced
+
saar.raz marked an inline comment as done.
saar.raz added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaOverload.cpp:6340-6347
if (!AllowExplicit) {
ExplicitSpecifier ES = ExplicitSpecifier::getFromDecl(Function);
if (ES.getKind() != ExplicitSpecKind::ResolvedFalse
rsmith accepted this revision.
rsmith added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
Thanks, I'm happy to iterate on this further after you commit (though feel free
to ask for another round of review if you prefer). The changes to recovery from
missing parens in a trailing req
thakis added a comment.
This breaks tests on Windows: http://45.33.8.238/win/5368/step_7.txt
Please take a look and revert if it takes a while to investigate.
Repository:
rG LLVM Github Monorepo
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
rsmith added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticParseKinds.td:179-180
def err_unexpected_semi : Error<"unexpected ';' before %0">;
+def err_expected_primary_got_unary : Error<
+ "expected primary expression before %0; did you forget parentheses?">;
saar.raz added inline comments.
Comment at: clang/lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp:2068-2069
if (ParseAsmAttributesAfterDeclarator(D))
return nullptr;
rsmith wrote:
> We should check with GCC to see which side of the requires-clause they expect
> this.
>
> F
saar.raz updated this revision to Diff 159349.
saar.raz added a comment.
Herald added a subscriber: jfb.
- Fix bad diagnostic detection and suppression
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
Files:
include/clang/AST/Decl.h
include/clang/AST/DeclCXX.h
include/clang/AST/Rec
rsmith added a comment.
Looking promising, but this patch will need some rework: you need to track the
trailing requires clause on the `Declarator` itself, not on the `DeclChunk`,
because it's not part of the `DeclChunk` (and may appear in contexts where
there is no function chunk).
saar.raz added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:8377-8381
+ } else if (D.hasTrailingRequiresClause()) {
+// C++2a [class.virtual]p6
+// A virtual method shall not have a requires-clause.
+Diag(NewFD->getTrailingRequiresClause()->getL
rsmith added inline comments.
Comment at: lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp:8377-8381
+ } else if (D.hasTrailingRequiresClause()) {
+// C++2a [class.virtual]p6
+// A virtual method shall not have a requires-clause.
+Diag(NewFD->getTrailingRequiresClause()->getLoc
saar.raz updated this revision to Diff 147188.
saar.raz added a comment.
- Fixed handling of empty/non-expression after trailing requires keyword.
- Unified satisfaction check for templated/non-templated constraint exprs
Repository:
rC Clang
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357
Files:
include/c
martong requested changes to this revision.
martong added inline comments.
This revision now requires changes to proceed.
Comment at: lib/AST/ASTImporter.cpp:3053
+D->isInlineSpecified(), D->isImplicit(), D->isConstexpr(),
+InheritedConstructor(), FromConstructor-
martong accepted this revision.
martong added a comment.
This revision is now accepted and ready to land.
From the `ASTImporter` point of view it looks good, thanks for the changes!
Repository:
rC Clang
CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION
https://reviews.llvm.org/D43357/new/
https://reviews.llvm.org
14 matches
Mail list logo