[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-24 Thread Michał Górny via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mgorny added a comment. Thank you! Repository: rL LLVM https://reviews.llvm.org/D50171 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-24 Thread Michał Górny via Phabricator via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL342897: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion (authored by mgorny, committed by ). Herald added a subscriber: llvm-commits. Changed prior to commit:

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-24 Thread Ilya Biryukov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
ilya-biryukov accepted this revision. ilya-biryukov added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D50171#1236792, @mgorny wrote: > @ilya-biryukov, gentle ping. I'd like to patch this for 7.0.0 in Gentoo. Do > you think my patch would be good

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-17 Thread Michał Górny via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mgorny added a comment. @ilya-biryukov, gentle ping. I'd like to patch this for 7.0.0 in Gentoo. Do you think my patch would be good enough, or do you expect to submit something else soonish? https://reviews.llvm.org/D50171 ___ cfe-commits

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-12 Thread Ilya Biryukov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
ilya-biryukov added a comment. Will take a closer look. Thanks for finding the offending revision. https://reviews.llvm.org/D50171 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-11 Thread Michał Górny via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mgorny added a comment. ...and unless I'm mistaken, this commit is responsible for both changes (that is, I need to apply all of this patch to make tests pass at its point). https://reviews.llvm.org/D50171 ___ cfe-commits mailing list

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-11 Thread Michał Górny via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mgorny added a comment. Apparently the first change changing the completion results is: commit a408f8d27bfd5bab55c39ef2a6fff6850be4a351 Author: Ilya Biryukov Date: Tue Apr 24 15:48:53 2018 [CodeComplete] Fix completion at the end of keywords Summary: Make

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-11 Thread Michał Górny via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mgorny updated this revision to Diff 164871. mgorny added a comment. Ai, sorry about that. Uploaded the proper diff now. I suppose it's not going to make it for 7.0.0 anymore, so it's not a priority. I'll try to bisect it today once I finish testing RC3. https://reviews.llvm.org/D50171

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-11 Thread Ilya Biryukov via Phabricator via cfe-commits
ilya-biryukov added a comment. Also can't explain why `const` and `volatile` have a different priority now. The `P::` and `Q::` seem to be completely different completion items from `P` and `Q` (wildly different priorities suggest they're not the same), can't explain what caused the first ones

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-09-11 Thread Michał Górny via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mgorny added a comment. Ping. Repository: rC Clang https://reviews.llvm.org/D50171 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D50171: [python] [tests] Update test_code_completion

2018-08-02 Thread Michał Górny via Phabricator via cfe-commits
mgorny created this revision. mgorny added reviewers: ilya-biryukov, arphaman, bkramer, gribozavr. Update expected completions to match output generated by clang-7.0. Disclaimer: I have no clue if the results are correct. I'm kinda wondering why the '::' part is no longer included immediately.