[PATCH] D52988: [analyzer][PlistMacroExpansion] Part 5.: Support for # and ##

2018-11-30 Thread Umann Kristóf via Phabricator via cfe-commits
This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Closed by commit rL348025: [analyzer][PlistMacroExpansion] Part 5.: Support for # and ## (authored by Szelethus, committed by ). Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, gamesh411. Changed prior to commit: https://reviews.

[PATCH] D52988: [analyzer][PlistMacroExpansion] Part 5.: Support for # and ##

2018-11-01 Thread Artem Dergachev via Phabricator via cfe-commits
NoQ accepted this revision. NoQ added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. Yay. https://reviews.llvm.org/D52988 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org http://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D52988: [analyzer][PlistMacroExpansion] Part 5.: Support for # and ##

2018-10-18 Thread Umann Kristóf via Phabricator via cfe-commits
Szelethus updated this revision to Diff 170073. Szelethus added a comment. Fixed an issue where if `##` had spaces around it, those spaces weren't removed. https://reviews.llvm.org/D52988 Files: lib/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PlistDiagnostics.cpp test/Analysis/Inputs/expected-plists/plist-macros-w

[PATCH] D52988: [analyzer][PlistMacroExpansion] Part 5.: Support for # and ##

2018-10-17 Thread Umann Kristóf via Phabricator via cfe-commits
Szelethus added a comment. I verified this project on tmux, which uses the preprocessor very heavily. It works perfectly, and doesn't crash anywhere despite the **very** liberal use of asserts. In https://reviews.llvm.org/D52988#1267382, @whisperity wrote: > Looks good. > > What happens if the

[PATCH] D52988: [analyzer][PlistMacroExpansion] Part 5.: Support for # and ##

2018-10-16 Thread Whisperity via Phabricator via cfe-commits
whisperity added a comment. Looks good. What happens if the macro is to stringify a partially string argument? #define BOOYAH(x) #x "; ... std::string foo = BOOYAH(blabla) std::string foo2 = BOOYAH("blabla) int x = 2; Not sure if these cases are even valid C(XX), but if they ar

[PATCH] D52988: [analyzer][PlistMacroExpansion] Part 5.: Support for # and ##

2018-10-16 Thread Umann Kristóf via Phabricator via cfe-commits
Szelethus updated this revision to Diff 169871. Szelethus added a comment. Herald added a subscriber: dkrupp. This patch didn't really work, sometimes it printed extra spaces, sometimes printed the hash tokens, and so on, so I refactored the whole project to deal with this issue almost out of th

[PATCH] D52988: [analyzer][PlistMacroExpansion] Part 5.: Support for # and ##

2018-10-08 Thread Umann Kristóf via Phabricator via cfe-commits
Szelethus created this revision. Szelethus added reviewers: xazax.hun, NoQ, george.karpenkov, rnkovacs, baloghadamsoftware. Herald added subscribers: cfe-commits, mikhail.ramalho, a.sidorin, szepet, whisperity. >From what I can see, this should be the last patch needed to replicate macro >argum