[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

plotfi added a comment. In D74166#2107831 , @plotfi wrote: > @rjmccall > > FYI this diff appears to be breaking a ptrauth test on > apple/swift/master-next > (clang/test/CodeGenCXX/ptrauth-static-destructors.cpp). > > Investigating this further. Looks

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

plotfi added subscribers: rjmccall, plotfi. plotfi added a comment. @rjmccall FYI this diff appears to be breaking a ptrauth test on apple/swift/master-next (clang/test/CodeGenCXX/ptrauth-static-destructors.cpp). Investigating this further. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

This revision was automatically updated to reflect the committed changes. Xiangling_L marked an inline comment as done. Closed by commit rG22337bfe7d87: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority (authored by Xiangling_L). Changed prior to commit: https://reviews

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast accepted this revision. hubert.reinterpretcast marked an inline comment as done. hubert.reinterpretcast added a comment. Thanks; LGTM with minor nit. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.h:1060 + + /// Add a sterm finalizer to the C++ global clean

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu accepted this revision. jasonliu added a comment. This revision is now accepted and ready to land. LGTM. But I suggest to wait for @hubert.reinterpretcast to have another scan at this before landing. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:345 +// rarely. +Weights = nullptr; + } else if (Kind == GuardKind::VariableGuard && !D->isLocalVarDecl()) { jasonliu wrote: > Do we need to change/complicate the interface fo

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 271747. Xiangling_L marked 3 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L added a comment. Removed a redundant header file; Addressed comments; CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/incl

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:345 +// rarely. +Weights = nullptr; + } else if (Kind == GuardKind::VariableGuard && !D->isLocalVarDecl()) { Do we need to change/complicate the interface for this function, just

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 271668. Xiangling_L added a comment. Fix the previous bad version; CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h clang/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp clang/lib/

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 271664. Xiangling_L marked an inline comment as done. Xiangling_L added a comment. Adjust the patch corresponding to D81972 ; CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D741

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:708 +" based on strong external symbols"); + GlobalUniqueModuleId = GlobalUniqueModuleId.substr(1); +} jasonliu wrote: > Correct me if I'm wrong... > `GlobalUnique

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 271550. Xiangling_L marked 11 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L edited the summary of this revision. Xiangling_L added a comment. Herald added a subscriber: jfb. Remove trailing spaces; Update the testcase; Adjust the EmitGuardedInitBranch function; C

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:835 + + llvm::CallInst *CI = nullptr; + if (Arg == nullptr) { nit: trailing whitespace Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/static-init.cpp:31 +namespace test4 { +

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:708 +" based on strong external symbols"); + GlobalUniqueModuleId = GlobalUniqueModuleId.substr(1); +} Correct me if I'm wrong... `GlobalUniqueModuleId` will always g

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp:4489 + // DestructCallBlock, otherwise jump to EndBlock directly. + CGF.EmitCXXGuardedInitBranch(NeedsDestruct, DestructCallBlock, EndBlock, + CodeGenFunc

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp:4489 + // DestructCallBlock, otherwise jump to EndBlock directly. + CGF.EmitCXXGuardedInitBranch(NeedsDestruct, DestructCallBlock, EndBlock, + CodeGenFunction::Guard

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 271156. Xiangling_L marked 35 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L added a comment. Renamed some functions; Add one more test; etc. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.l

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/static-init.cpp:31 +// CHECK: @llvm.global_ctors = appending global [1 x { i32, void ()*, i8* }] [{ i32, void ()*, i8* } { i32 65535, void ()* @__sinit8000_clang_510e898aa8d263cac999dd03eeed5b51, i

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp:4482 + llvm::Value *NeedsDestruct = + CGF.Builder.CreateIsNull(V, "needsDestruct"); + There are uses of `CreateIsNull` with `snake_case`; this is the only `camelC

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:277 + llvm::FunctionType::get(CGM.VoidTy, false) && + "atexit has wrong parameter type."); + s/atexit has wrong parameter type/Argument to atexit has a w

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/static-init.cpp:8 +// RUN: FileCheck %s struct test { Xiangling_L wrote: > jasonliu wrote: > > Looks like the non-inline comments are easier to get ignored and missed, so > > I wil

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/static-init.cpp:31 +// CHECK: @llvm.global_ctors = appending global [1 x { i32, void ()*, i8* }] [{ i32, void ()*, i8* } { i32 65535, void ()* @__sinit8000_clang_510e898aa8d263cac999dd03eeed5b51, i

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast marked an inline comment as done. hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:700 + +Fn = CreateGlobalInitOrDestructFunction( +FTy, llvm::Twine("__sterm8000_clang_") + GlobalUniqueModuleId, FI, -

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 270548. Xiangling_L marked 35 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L edited the summary of this revision. Xiangling_L added a comment. Address another round of reviews; Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:639 + if (CXXGlobalInits.empty()) +return; hubert.reinterpretcast wrote: > Can this part be committed in a separate patch? It does not appear to have > dependencies on other pa

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:807 void CodeGenFunction::GenerateCXXGlobalDtorsFunc( llvm::Function *Fn, This function is to be renamed. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenMod

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/static-init.cpp:12 ~test(); -} t; +} t1, t2; I suggest adding also one each of the following: - a dynamic initialization of a non-local variable of type `int` - a `constinit` i

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu added inline comments. Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/static-init.cpp:8 +// RUN: FileCheck %s struct test { Looks like the non-inline comments are easier to get ignored and missed, so I will copy paste the non-inlined comment I previously had: ```

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:682 void CodeGenModule::EmitCXXGlobalDtorFunc() { if (CXXGlobalDtors.empty()) return; hubert.reinterpretcast wrote: > Following from my previous comments on `CXXGlo

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:824 std::tie(CalleeTy, Callee, Arg) = DtorsAndObjects[e - i - 1]; - llvm::CallInst *CI = Builder.CreateCall(CalleeTy, Callee, Arg); + llvm::CallInst *CI = (Arg == nullptr) +

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp:5231 + CXXNameMangler Mangler(*this, Out); + Mangler.getStream() << "__cxx_global_var_destruct_"; + if (shouldMangleDeclName(D)) I believe these are actually paired with

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:293 +CodeGenFunction::unregisterGlobalDtorWithUnAtExit(llvm::Function *dtorStub) { + // extern "C" int unatexit(void (*f)(void)); + assert(dtorStub->getFunctionType() == P

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L added inline comments. Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h:178 + virtual void mangleDynamicDestructor(const VarDecl *D, raw_ostream &Out) = 0; + hubert.reinterpretcast wrote: > I am not sure "destructor" is the right term here. This seems

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 270267. Xiangling_L marked 21 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L added a comment. Address another round of reviews; CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/clang/AST/Mang

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:305 + if (llvm::Function *unatexitFn = + dyn_cast(unatexit.getCallee())) +unatexitFn->setDoesNotThrow(); Xiangling_L wrote: > jasonliu wrote: > > Is there a va

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h:178 + virtual void mangleDynamicDestructor(const VarDecl *D, raw_ostream &Out) = 0; + I am not sure "destructor" is the right term here. This seems to be an analogue to

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:562 +static std::string getTransformedFileName(llvm::Module &M) { + SmallString<128> FileName = llvm::sys::path::filename(M.getName()); Consider having the `SmallString<1

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp:4447 + + // Create __dtor function for the var decl. + llvm::Function *dtorStub = CGF.createAtExitStub(D, dtor, addr); We should probably report_fatal_error if `CXAAtE

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGCXXABI.h:113 + + virtual bool isCXXGlobalInitAndDtorFuncInternal() const { return true; } + Xiangling_L wrote: > jasonliu wrote: > > Do we need this isCXXGlobalInitAndDtorFuncInternal? Looks like it

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp:5217 + else +Mangler.getStream() << D->getName(); +} jasonliu wrote: > If I understand correctly, this function will come in pair with > `__cxx_global_var_init`. > `__cxx_global_

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 269900. Xiangling_L marked 17 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L added a comment. Address the comments Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/clan

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu added a comment. -fregister_global_dtors_with_atexit does not seem to work properly in current implementation. We should consider somehow disabling/report_fatal_error it instead of letting it generate invalid code on AIX. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:305 + if (llvm::Function *unatexitFn = + dyn_cast(unatexit.getCallee())) +unatexitFn->setDoesNotThrow(); Is there a valid case that unatexit.getCallee() returns a type which

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

jasonliu added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/AST/ItaniumMangle.cpp:5217 + else +Mangler.getStream() << D->getName(); +} If I understand correctly, this function will come in pair with `__cxx_global_var_init`. `__cxx_global_var_init` use number as s

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 266087. Xiangling_L added a comment. Adjust `mangleDynamicDestructor`; Add assertion and FIXME for getUniqueModuleId Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 264926. Xiangling_L marked an inline comment as done. Xiangling_L added a comment. Fix the linkage types; Adjust the formatting; Update the testcase; Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

hubert.reinterpretcast added inline comments. Comment at: clang/test/CodeGen/static-init.cpp:14 +// CHECK: @llvm.global_dtors = appending global [1 x { i32, void ()*, i8* }] [{ i32, void ()*, i8* } { i32 65535, void ()* @__sterm8000_clang_b2e4830f1c9d2d063e5ea946868f3bfd, i

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 264009. Xiangling_L added a comment. Clean `clang-tidy` warnings and `clang-format` errors Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/cl

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 263843. Xiangling_L added a comment. Fix a minor issue in the testcase Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h c

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 263499. Xiangling_L marked 3 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L added a comment. Updated the warnings to `report_fatal_error`; Update the testcases; Repository: rL LLVM CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://review

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L marked 7 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:691 AddGlobalDtor(Fn); + CXXGlobalDtors.clear(); } ZarkoCA wrote: > I may be missing something but why do we need this now, as oppose

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

ZarkoCA added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:691 AddGlobalDtor(Fn); + CXXGlobalDtors.clear(); } I may be missing something but why do we need this now, as opposed to not needing it before? Why didn't we need to clear the CXXGlo

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

aaron.ballman added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp:6898 case ParsedAttr::AT_Constructor: -handleConstructorAttr(S, D, AL); +if (S.Context.getTargetInfo().getTriple().isOSAIX()) + S.Diag(AL.getLoc(), diag::warn_attribute_type_not_suppo

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 261602. Xiangling_L added a comment. Herald added a reviewer: aaron.ballman. Fix a minor issue Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/includ

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

daltenty added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:583 + if (UseSinitAndSterm) +GlobalUniqueModuleId = getUniqueModuleId(&getModule()).substr(1); + if `getUniqueModuleId()` returns an empy string, which it does for modules which don

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 255456. Xiangling_L added a comment. Rebase on the latest master branch; Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 248571. Xiangling_L marked 2 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L added a comment. Fix the formatting issue; Address the 1st round reviews; CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L marked 4 inline comments as done. Xiangling_L added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:283 llvm::FunctionCallee atexit = - CGM.CreateRuntimeFunction(atexitTy, "atexit", llvm::AttributeList(), -/*Local=*

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

sfertile added inline comments. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/CGDeclCXX.cpp:283 llvm::FunctionCallee atexit = - CGM.CreateRuntimeFunction(atexitTy, "atexit", llvm::AttributeList(), -/*Local=*/true); + CGM.CreateRuntimeFunction(atexitTy

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

sfertile added a comment. Please fix the formatting issues flagged by the pre-merge checks. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 ___ cfe-commits mail

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

yusra.syeda added a comment. Overall the patch LGTM, aside from 1 change we may want to make. Comment at: clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp:531 + + bool isCXXGlobalInitAndDtorFuncInternal() const override { return false; } + Perhaps adding a check to see if

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 247360. Xiangling_L added a comment. Clean the formatting issues; Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h clang/

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 247355. Xiangling_L added a comment. Rebase on the latest master branch. Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L added a comment. ping. CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 245929. Xiangling_L edited the summary of this revision. Xiangling_L added a comment. Update the testcase; CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/include/clang/AST/Mangle.h clan

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L updated this revision to Diff 245879. Xiangling_L added a comment. Rebase to incorparate `XL` C++ ABI name && comdat changes; Repository: rG LLVM Github Monorepo CHANGES SINCE LAST ACTION https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166/new/ https://reviews.llvm.org/D74166 Files: clang/inclu

[PATCH] D74166: [AIX][Frontend] Static init implementation for AIX considering no priority

Xiangling_L created this revision. Xiangling_L added reviewers: hubert.reinterpretcast, cebowleratibm, yusra.syeda, sfertile, jasonliu, xingxue, hfinkel. Xiangling_L added a project: LLVM. Herald added subscribers: llvm-commits, cfe-commits, dexonsmith. Herald added a project: clang. Xiangling_L a