https://github.com/efriedma-quic created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87725
MSVC doesn't support generating __vectorcall calls in Arm64EC mode, but it does
treat it as a distinct type. The Microsoft STL depends on this functionality.
(Not sure if this is intentional.) Add suppo
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-aarch64
Author: Eli Friedman (efriedma-quic)
Changes
MSVC doesn't support generating __vectorcall calls in Arm64EC mode, but it does
treat it as a distinct type. The Microsoft STL depends on this functionality.
(Not sure if this is intentiona
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Eli Friedman (efriedma-quic)
Changes
MSVC doesn't support generating __vectorcall calls in Arm64EC mode, but it does
treat it as a distinct type. The Microsoft STL depends on this functionality.
(Not sure if this is intentional.) Add s
efriedma-quic wrote:
CC @bylaws @mstorsjo @cjacek @MaxEW707 @CaseyCarter
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87725
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaxEW707 wrote:
LGTM.
>From memory, its been a while since I've had to ship on ARM64EC, all instances
>of `__vectorcall` are supposed to be rejected by msvc. That also aligns with
>the `__vectorcall` docs on MSDN.
I am not sure what clang's policy is with potentially allowing code that
"shoul
https://github.com/MaxEW707 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87725
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cjacek approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87725
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/87725
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
CaseyCarter wrote:
> @CaseyCarter It feels like we are missing an arm64ec check here,
> https://github.com/microsoft/STL/blob/be81252ed1f5e5fc6d77faca0b5dbbbdae8143a2/stl/inc/type_traits#L398
> unless this was intentional and just not documented?
I have absolutely no idea what's going on here
