[clang] [CIR] Introduce cir::RecordKind::Class (PR #142690)

https://github.com/andykaylor closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142690 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [CIR] Introduce cir::RecordKind::Class (PR #142690)

https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142690 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [CIR] Introduce cir::RecordKind::Class (PR #142690)

https://github.com/xlauko approved this pull request. lgtm https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142690 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [CIR] Introduce cir::RecordKind::Class (PR #142690)

https://github.com/xlauko edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142690 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [CIR] Introduce cir::RecordKind::Class (PR #142690)

https://github.com/andykaylor created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142690 When cir::RecordType was initially upstreamed, we decided that there was no reason to distinguish between RecordKind::Class and RecordKind::Struct since they are semantically equivalent. I think this was a m

[clang] [CIR] Introduce cir::RecordKind::Class (PR #142690)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Andy Kaylor (andykaylor) Changes When cir::RecordType was initially upstreamed, we decided that there was no reason to distinguish between RecordKind::Class and RecordKind::Struct since they are semantically equivalent. I think this was a