llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 10 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/5567
Here is the r
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
DanielKristofKiss wrote:
> I think this is OK but do you know if the dsp side works with cortex-m?
> Target attributes are less likely to be used there, but it's worth testing if
> the command line args are still all happy.
This seems works fine:
```c
#include
int dsp() {
return __smlabb(
https://github.com/davemgreen commented:
I think this is OK but do you know if the dsp side works with cortex-m? Target
attributes are less likely to be used there, but it's worth testing if the
command line args are still all happy.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107417
___
DanielKristofKiss wrote:
Clang-format failure is expected as I kept intentionally the format to match
with the rest of the file.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 1693d8eb9aa94b0e8e2395234e6c63b57a2017b7
9dadc9bffc40e02dff9ef6a1d79968c8980892f4 --e
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Daniel Kiss (DanielKristofKiss)
Changes
Both feature has target feature so can be checked if the usage is valid.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107417.diff
2 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/Headers/arm_
https://github.com/DanielKristofKiss created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/107417
Both feature has target feature so can be checked if the usage is valid.
>From 9dadc9bffc40e02dff9ef6a1d79968c8980892f4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Daniel Kiss
Date: Thu, 5 Sep 2024 16:42:43 +0200
