mshockwave wrote:
> I can understand the rationale, but adding this special case feels stranger
> to me..
I'm fine with not having a special file extension for LTO'd stats file, hence
closing this PR.
That said, it would be really helpful if you could help me to review a related
PR #71197 .
https://github.com/mshockwave closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70242
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
MaskRay wrote:
I can understand the rationale, but adding this special case feels stranger to
me..
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70242
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Min-Yih Hsu (mshockwave)
Changes
Use "output filename.ld.stats" instead of "base input
filename.stats" for stats file generated by LTO backend. The new extension
makes it easier to search for LTO'd stats file and be consistent with LTO'd
https://github.com/mshockwave created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/70242
Use ".ld.stats" instead of ".stats" for
stats file generated by LTO backend. The new extension makes it easier to
search for LTO'd stats file and be consistent with LTO'd optimization remarks
files' naming
