mikaoP wrote:
Maybe the discussing topic is, as you said, if we allow specifying `x86_64` as
target. Or fixing the rpath format if we support that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
mikaoP wrote:
Maybe I'm not getting what you say. I see that when you use
`-fopenmp-targets=x86-64-unknown-linux-gnu` then no gcc command is issued. In
any case, a clang command is run with `-rpath ` or `-Wl,-rpath,`.
The last is what this patch does only for CPU offloading. I guess that does
jhuber6 wrote:
If you really need this, perhaps you can check if the Triple will invoke the
fallback toolchain or something? Would be a lack of vendor in the Triple.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-comm
jhuber6 wrote:
> > I thought that clang accepted `-rpath `? I see that format when I try
> > CPU offloading.
>
> Yeah, but when running `--target=x86_64` and underlying gcc command is issued
> and complains about `-rpath `
Oh, I see. When using `-fopenmp-targets=x86_64` it goes through the de
mikaoP wrote:
> I thought that clang accepted `-rpath `? I see that format when I try
> CPU offloading.
Yeah, but when running `--target=x86_64` and underlying gcc command is issued
and complains about `-rpath `
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
_
jhuber6 wrote:
I remember intentionally using the clang argument format instead of
`-Wl,-rpath,` because the `-Wl` format would try to forward it to things
like `nvlink` which don't support it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-
mikaoP wrote:
Ah, right. I'll remove the folder then
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jhuber6 wrote:
The tests use an option that causes nothing to actually run, so it only uses
the filename.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https:
mikaoP wrote:
Ah, since in the test I had to put an rpath I though that for the test we
needed a valid folder
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
jhuber6 wrote:
What is this?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jhuber6 commented:
I thought that clang accepted `-rpath `? I see that format when I try CPU
offloading.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/
https://github.com/jhuber6 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/mikaoP edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95763
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
13 matches
Mail list logo
