[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

https://github.com/cor3ntin closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67538 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

cor3ntin wrote: > I wonder does this also fix this: #67058 Nope, this is unrelated, sadly. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67538 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

shafik wrote: I wonder does this also fix this: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/67058 https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67538 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

@@ -718,3 +718,8 @@ void foo() { void GH48527() { auto a = []()__attribute__((b(({ return 0; }{}; // expected-warning {{unknown attribute 'b' ignored}} } + +void GH67492() { + constexpr auto test = 42; + auto lambda = (test, []() noexcept(true) {}); er

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

@@ -718,3 +718,8 @@ void foo() { void GH48527() { auto a = []()__attribute__((b(({ return 0; }{}; // expected-warning {{unknown attribute 'b' ignored}} } + +void GH67492() { + constexpr auto test = 42; + auto lambda = (test, []() noexcept(true) {}); co

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67538 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

https://github.com/erichkeane resolved https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67538 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

@@ -718,3 +718,8 @@ void foo() { void GH48527() { auto a = []()__attribute__((b(({ return 0; }{}; // expected-warning {{unknown attribute 'b' ignored}} } + +void GH67492() { + constexpr auto test = 42; + auto lambda = (test, []() noexcept(true) {}); er

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

@@ -718,3 +718,8 @@ void foo() { void GH48527() { auto a = []()__attribute__((b(({ return 0; }{}; // expected-warning {{unknown attribute 'b' ignored}} } + +void GH67492() { + constexpr auto test = 42; + auto lambda = (test, []() noexcept(true) {}); co

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

@@ -718,3 +718,8 @@ void foo() { void GH48527() { auto a = []()__attribute__((b(({ return 0; }{}; // expected-warning {{unknown attribute 'b' ignored}} } + +void GH67492() { + constexpr auto test = 42; + auto lambda = (test, []() noexcept(true) {}); er

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Changes The conditions of a noexcept and explicit specifier are full expressions. Before this patch, we would call ActOnFinishFullExpr on these in the context of the enclosing expression, which would cause the collect of odr-used variables (and s

[clang] [Clang] Handle sema of noexcept condition in their evaluation context. (PR #67538)

https://github.com/cor3ntin created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/67538 The conditions of a noexcept and explicit specifier are full expressions. Before this patch, we would call ActOnFinishFullExpr on these in the context of the enclosing expression, which would cause the collect