https://github.com/SixWeining closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/heiher approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
SixWeining wrote:
Hi @xen0n @xry111, please help to review this. Thanks.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71025
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Lu Weining (SixWeining)
Changes
In g++, empty unions are not ignored like empty structs when flattening structs
to examine whether the structs can be passed via FARs in C++. This patch aligns
clang++ with g++.
Fix
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-loongarch
Author: Lu Weining (SixWeining)
Changes
In g++, empty unions are not ignored like empty structs when flattening structs
to examine whether the structs can be passed via FARs in C++. This patch aligns
clang++ with g++.
Fix
https://github.com/SixWeining created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/71025
In g++, empty unions are not ignored like empty structs when flattening structs
to examine whether the structs can be passed via FARs in C++. This patch aligns
clang++ with g++.
Fix
