https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/shafik approved this pull request.
LGTM, thank you for the documentation fix.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/sousajo-cc edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sousajo-cc wrote:
fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/90472
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90485
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Jorge Pinto Sousa (sousajo-cc)
Changes
operator bool from NestedNameSpecifierLoc and
member function hasQualifier both do the same thing, returning true iff the
private data member Qualifier is not nullptr, so clearly one of the comments
https://github.com/sousajo-cc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90485
operator bool from NestedNameSpecifierLoc and
member function hasQualifier both do the same thing, returning true iff the
private data member Qualifier is not nullptr, so clearly one of the comments is
