https://github.com/labrinea approved this pull request.
We can debate on what the sensible behavior ought to be, but I agree having a
test in place to show the current behavior is a good idea. Thanks for writing
one.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143570
https://github.com/davemgreen approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143570
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Tomas Matheson (tmatheson-arm)
Changes
This adds tests that document how -cc1 and -print-enabled-extensions interact.
The current behaviour looks wrong, and is caused by the fact that
--print-enabled-extensions uses the MC subtarget featu
https://github.com/tmatheson-arm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143570
This adds tests that document how -cc1 and -print-enabled-extensions interact.
The current behaviour looks wrong, and is caused by the fact that
--print-enabled-extensions uses the MC subtarget feature AP
