https://github.com/Michael137 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Michael137 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
>From 2b1255de05856e4c79f58d3e4071384ba80a881d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Michael Buch
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2024 16:26:16 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang][Sema] Don't mark VarDecls of bindings in
tuple-li
https://github.com/adrian-prantl approved this pull request.
So this patch makes structured bindings not artificial, so they aren't hidden
in debuggers by default. That sounds right to me.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
___
cfe-commi
Michael137 wrote:
ping
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
Michael137 wrote:
> It looks like this is working for all other kinds of structured binding
> because `EmitDeclare(BindingDecl*, ...)` emits a proper `DILocalVariable` for
> them. But it skips `BindingDecl`s that have a holding variable for some
> reason. Perhaps a cleaner approach would be to
zygoloid wrote:
It looks like this is working for all other kinds of structured binding because
`EmitDeclare(BindingDecl*, ...)` emits a proper `DILocalVariable` for them. But
it skips `BindingDecl`s that have a holding variable for some reason. Perhaps a
cleaner approach would be to make it h
https://github.com/Michael137 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100355
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
