https://github.com/ldionne created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
1. Remove the format-checking job from the BuildKite pipeline. We now have a
monorepo-wide format checker implemented with Github Actions, so that should
not be necessary anymore.
2. Stop building and testing C
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Louis Dionne (ldionne)
Changes
1. Remove the format-checking job from the BuildKite pipeline. We now have a
monorepo-wide format checker implemented with Github Actions, so that should
not be necessary anymore.
2. Stop building and testi
https://github.com/tstellar commented:
If we aren't running the tests any more, can we build clang with
`-DLLVM_TARGETS_TO_BUILD=Native`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://li
Endilll wrote:
Do we even need to build Clang and run libc++ jobs? I don't even see them
linked in libc++ PR, even besides the fact that I think libc++ is fully tested
with GitHub Actions.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
___
cfe-commi
https://github.com/ldionne updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
>From 89afeebd55e0ae1167f5af803eb192b73a6e6799 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Louis Dionne
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 15:31:11 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][ci] Remove unnecessary BuildKite jobs for Clang
1. Re
ldionne wrote:
> Do we even need to build Clang and run libc++ jobs? I don't even see them
> linked in libc++ PR, even besides the fact that I think libc++ is fully
> tested with GitHub Actions.
What we're testing is that the changes to Clang didn't break libc++. We're
testing Clang via libc+
https://github.com/Endilll approved this pull request.
OK, I'll try to add this testing to "GitHub Pull Requests" later so that we can
avoid building Clang twice.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits
https://github.com/tstellar approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thanks, this should help free up some builder resources.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-b
ldionne wrote:
I will merge once the CI has passed. If someone else sees the CI green, feel
free to merge too.
@Endilll We could indeed "flatten" the `clang-ci` pipeline into the
`github-pull-requests` pipeline. Basically, instead of triggering the
`clang-ci` pipeline like this:
https://gith
https://github.com/Endilll closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93233
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
10 matches
Mail list logo
