https://github.com/martinboehme closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90898
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
martinboehme wrote:
CI failures appear to be unrelated.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90898
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -556,14 +556,23 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
copyRecord(*LocSrc, *LocDst, Env);
- // If the expr is a glvalue, we can reasonably assume the operator is
- // returning T& and thus we can assign it `LocDst`.
- if
@@ -556,14 +556,23 @@ class TransferVisitor : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
copyRecord(*LocSrc, *LocDst, Env);
- // If the expr is a glvalue, we can reasonably assume the operator is
- // returning T& and thus we can assign it `LocDst`.
- if
https://github.com/Xazax-hun approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90898
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ymand approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90898
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
The existing code was full of comments about how we assume this is always the
case, but it's not mandated by the standard, and there is code out there that
returns a different type. So check that the result type
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: None (martinboehme)
Changes
The existing code was full of comments about how we assume this is always the
case, but it's not mandated by the standard, and there is code out there that
returns a different type. So check that the
https://github.com/martinboehme created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/90898
The existing code was full of comments about how we assume this is always the
case, but it's not mandated by the standard, and there is code out there that
returns a different type. So check that the result
