erichkeane wrote:
We do need a unit test for this, a reduced version of the original fuzzed
result will help us review this.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77698
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://github.com/DavidKorczynski edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77698
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (DavidKorczynski)
Changes
There are cases where `Tok.is(tok::eof)` is true and
`PP.mightHavePendingAnnotationTokens()` is also true, and in these cases a UAF
may happen on the destroyed template IDs.
Fixes:
https://github.com/DavidKorczynski created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/77698
There are cases where `Tok.is(tok::eof)` is true and
`PP.mightHavePendingAnnotationTokens()` is also true, and in these cases a UAF
may happen on the destroyed template IDs.
Fixes:
