[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

https://github.com/zyn0217 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

zyn0217 wrote: Thank you folks! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

https://github.com/zyn0217 updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 >From 8681b3c9f5e19b6ae977321d5d4154113273c2a0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Younan Zhang Date: Sun, 12 Nov 2023 13:21:03 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 This is a follow-up patc

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

cor3ntin wrote: @zyn0217 I think the existing release note could mention #71684. LGTM otherwise https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

Endilll wrote: DR test changes look good to me, but wait for another reviewer. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

zyn0217 wrote: friendly ping~ https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

zyn0217 wrote: Note I'm not adding an extra release note since the previous implementation has done that and hasn't been cherry-picked or released yet. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

llvmbot wrote: @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: Younan Zhang (zyn0217) Changes This is a follow-up patch for [D156993](https://reviews.llvm.org/D156993), that marks only the lambda body as non-immediate context. Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/71684 --- Patch is 20.

[clang] [clang] Correctly implement CWG 2672 (PR #75001)

https://github.com/zyn0217 created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/75001 This is a follow-up patch for [D156993](https://reviews.llvm.org/D156993), that marks only the lambda body as non-immediate context. Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/71684 >From 8681b3c9f5e19b6