@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -ferror-limit 0 -verify %s
hokein wrote:
This file contains many errors, the number of the errors exceeds the default
number (19) in clang, which affects the clang behavior
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -verify %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -std=c++20 -ferror-limit 0 -verify %s
shafik wrote:
Why the `ferror-limit 0`?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86794
___
https://github.com/hokein closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86794
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Sirraide approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86794
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Haojian Wu (hokein)
Changes
I found this issue (a separate one) during the investigation of #86757,
the crash is similar in substituteParameterMappings, but at different inner
places.
This was an out-of-bound issue where we access front
https://github.com/hokein created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/86794
I found this issue (a separate one) during the investigation of #86757, the
crash is similar in substituteParameterMappings, but at different inner places.
This was an out-of-bound issue where we access front
