llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-aarch64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot7` while building `clang-tools-extra,clang` at
step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/51/builds/676
Here is the relev
vitalybuka wrote:
@sstwcw Please don't ignore the presubmit, it detected issue before merging:
Some checks were not successful
2 skipped, 65 successful, 48 failing, and 3 pending checks
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits m
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-asan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot2` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/52/builds/317
Here is the relevant
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-msan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot5` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/164/builds/394
Here is the relevant
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-bootstrap-ubsan` running on `sanitizer-buildbot3` while
building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/25/builds/316
Here is the relevant
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv7-2stage`
running on `linaro-clang-armv7-2stage` while building `clang` at step 4 "build
stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/79/builds/203
Here is the relevant piece of
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv7-vfpv3-2stage`
running on `linaro-clang-armv7-vfpv3-2stage` while building `clang` at step 4
"build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/135/builds/203
Here is the rele
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `sanitizer-x86_64-linux`
running on `sanitizer-buildbot1` while building `clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/66/builds/540
Here is the relevant piece of the bui
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`sanitizer-x86_64-linux-fast` running on `sanitizer-buildbot3` while building
`clang` at step 2 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/169/builds/383
Here is the relevant piece of
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-cmake-x86_64-avx512-win` running on `avx512-intel64-win` while building
`clang` at step 5 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/81/builds/253
Here is the relevant piec
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `fuchsia-x86_64-linux`
running on `fuchsia-debian-64-us-central1-a-1` while building `clang` at step 4
"annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/11/builds/566
Here is the relevant pie
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-aarch64-sve-vla-2stage` running on `linaro-g3-03` while building `clang`
at step 6 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/41/builds/269
Here is the relevant piece of th
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-s390x-linux-lnt`
running on `systemz-1` while building `clang` at step 6 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/136/builds/115
Here is the relevant piece of the build lo
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-s390x-linux` running
on `systemz-1` while building `clang` at step 4 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/42/builds/132
Here is the relevant piece of the build log for
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-solaris11-sparcv9`
running on `solaris11-sparcv9` while building `clang` at step 4 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/13/builds/272
Here is the relevant piece of the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-debian-cpp20`
running on `clang-debian-cpp20` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/108/builds/408
Here is the relevant piece of
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv7-lnt` running
on `linaro-clang-armv7-lnt` while building `clang` at step 6 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/77/builds/352
Here is the relevant piece of the bu
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-x86_64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-3` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/23/builds/331
Here is the relevant piece of
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv7-global-isel`
running on `linaro-clang-armv7-global-isel` while building `clang` at step 6
"build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/39/builds/195
Here is the relevan
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-aarch64-darwin`
running on `doug-worker-5` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/190/builds/623
Here is the relevant piece o
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-clang-win-x-aarch64`
running on `as-builder-2` while building `clang` at step 7 "build-llvm-project".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/193/builds/320
Here is the relevant piece of t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clangd-ubuntu-tsan`
running on `clangd-ubuntu-clang` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-clangd-clangd-index-server-clangd-indexer".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/134/builds/587
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vls`
running on `linaro-g3-04` while building `clang` at step 6 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/143/builds/201
Here is the relevant piece of the build
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-sve-vla`
running on `linaro-g3-03` while building `clang` at step 6 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/17/builds/257
Here is the relevant piece of the build
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-global-isel`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-global-isel` while building `clang` at step 6
"build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/125/builds/244
Here is the re
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`premerge-monolithic-windows` running on `premerge-windows-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/35/builds/338
Here is the relevant p
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-armv8-quick` running
on `linaro-clang-armv8-quick` while building `clang` at step 4 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/154/builds/464
Here is the relevant piece of t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64be-linux-multistage` running on `ppc64be-clang-multistage-test`
while building `clang` at step 4 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/167/builds/241
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-aarch64-quick`
running on `linaro-clang-aarch64-quick` while building `clang` at step 4 "build
stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/65/builds/469
Here is the relevant piece
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x64-windows-msvc`
running on `windows-gcebot2` while building `clang` at step 4 "annotate".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/63/builds/184
Here is the relevant piece of the build l
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64be-linux-test-suite` running on `ppc64be-clang-test-suite` while
building `clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/176/builds/358
Here is the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-test-suite` running on `ppc64le-clang-test-suite` while
building `clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/95/builds/428
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-ppc64le-rhel`
running on `ppc64le-clang-rhel-test` while building `clang` at step 5
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/145/builds/260
Here is the relevant piec
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`clang-ppc64le-linux-multistage` running on `ppc64le-clang-multistage-test`
while building `clang` at step 4 "build stage 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/76/builds/356
Here is the r
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-x86_64-debian-fast`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/56/builds/799
Here is the relevant piece of the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `llvm-x86_64-debian-dylib`
running on `gribozavr4` while building `clang` at step 5 "build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/60/builds/837
Here is the relevant piece of the
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `flang-runtime-cuda-clang`
running on `as-builder-7` while building `clang` at step 7
"build-clang-default".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/7/builds/497
Here is the relevant piece of t
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `premerge-monolithic-linux`
running on `premerge-linux-1` while building `clang` at step 6
"build-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/153/builds/1025
Here is the relevant pie
https://github.com/sstwcw closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sstwcw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
>From 9267f8f19a2e502ef5a216c0d52b352b3699d399 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sstwcw
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:34:08 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Add option to remove leading blank lines
(#91221)
The opt
@@ -45,6 +45,9 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, FormatsGlobalStatementsAt0) {
verifyFormat("\nint i;", " \n\t \v \f int i;");
verifyFormat("int i;\nint j;", "int i; int j;");
verifyFormat("int i;\nint j;", "int i;\n int j;");
+ auto Style = getLLVMStyle();
---
@@ -21947,6 +21950,10 @@ TEST_F(FormatTest, HandlesUTF8BOM) {
verifyFormat("\xef\xbb\xbf");
verifyFormat("\xef\xbb\xbf#include ");
verifyFormat("\xef\xbb\xbf\n#include ");
+ auto Style = getLLVMStyle();
owenca wrote:
Ditto.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/owenca edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/sstwcw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
>From 72e15ffb87eff94d51af69c0f804084ab7abe474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sstwcw
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:34:08 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] [clang-format] Add option to remove leading blank lines
---
clang/do
sstwcw wrote:
I was initially going to make removing leading blank lines the default.
Now the line is not needed anymore. But I forgot to remove it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.o
@@ -208,6 +208,9 @@ RawStringFormatStyleManager::RawStringFormatStyleManager(
LanguageStyle = PredefinedStyle;
}
LanguageStyle->ColumnLimit = CodeStyle.ColumnLimit;
+// This way the first line of the string does not have to follow the code
+// before the s
https://github.com/sstwcw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
>From 72e15ffb87eff94d51af69c0f804084ab7abe474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sstwcw
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:34:08 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-format] Add option to remove leading blank lines
---
clang/do
owenca wrote:
Please refer to e3eca335940251308c8990c8880341002e74b9c1 for
grouping/deprecating existing options with a new one.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm
https://github.com/sstwcw updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
>From 72e15ffb87eff94d51af69c0f804084ab7abe474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sstwcw
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:34:08 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-format] Add option to remove leading blank lines
---
clang/do
https://github.com/owenca requested changes to this pull request.
See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221#issuecomment-2105454428.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
owenca wrote:
> Should I make dropping leading blank lines the default?
We should keep leading blank lines (up to `MaxEmptyLinesToKeep`) by default as
before.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@li
owenca wrote:
I think this is a good time to combine the `KeepEmptyLines...` options. For
example:
```
KeepEmptyLines:
AtStartOfBlock: true
AtStartOfFile: false
AtEndOfFile: true
```
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commit
https://github.com/mydeveloperday approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
sstwcw wrote:
Should I make dropping leading blank lines the default?
There are some tests verifying that files that start with newlines should still
start with newlines after being formatted. However, they seem to be there to
prevent the newlines from moving to wrong places.
There is 303baf
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (sstwcw)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/ClangFormatStyleOptions.rst (+5)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/Format/Format.h (+5)
- (modified) c
https://github.com/sstwcw created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91221
None
>From 72e15ffb87eff94d51af69c0f804084ab7abe474 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: sstwcw
Date: Mon, 6 May 2024 14:34:08 +
Subject: [PATCH] [clang-format] Add option to remove leading blank lines
---
clang/
58 matches
Mail list logo
