mydeveloperday wrote:
> Isn't fixing bugs meant to change defaults? See #61732, #48746 and #93793.
> The old version is confusing since it looks like a separate template
> parameter when it isn't.
I'm ok, if the second style is what we want if thats what we are expecting then
I'm good with
rymiel wrote:
Isn't fixing bugs meant to change defaults? See #61732, #48746 and #93793. The
old version is confusing since it looks like a separate template parameter when
it isn't.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96396
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/mydeveloperday commented:
Doesn't this show a change in default formatting from
```c++
template class QQQ>
class PPP>
void comment_to_html_conversion_22()
```
```c++
template class QQQ> class PPP>
void comment_to_html_conversion_22()
```
I think the fact that the
https://github.com/rymiel closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96396
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96396
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Emilia Kond (rymiel)
Changes
Reapply 4a7bf42a9b83144db8a11ac06cce4da21166e6a2
which was reverted in 34d44eb41dfbbbf01712719558b02763334fbeb3
Not sure why there are tests elsewhere in clang that rely on the output of
clang-format, but
https://github.com/rymiel created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/96396
Reapply 4a7bf42a9b83144db8a11ac06cce4da21166e6a2
which was reverted in 34d44eb41dfbbbf01712719558b02763334fbeb3
Not sure why there are tests elsewhere in clang that rely on the output of
clang-format, but they
