https://github.com/mydeveloperday commented:
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78996
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
hnakamura5 wrote:
@HazardyKnusperkeks
Thank you for checking and accepting!
@mydeveloperday
You will be able to see the points in the consequent PRs.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78996
___
cfe-commits mailing list
https://github.com/hnakamura5 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78996
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
I didn't say anything because I was also waiting on @mydeveloperday.
I see no problem with the current approach and think token annotator tests are
enough.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78996
@@ -276,13 +276,44 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::tryMergePreviousTokens() {
return;
}
}
- // TableGen's Multi line string starts with [{
- if (Style.isTableGen() && tryMergeTokens({tok::l_square, tok::l_brace},
-
@@ -276,13 +276,44 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::tryMergePreviousTokens() {
return;
}
}
- // TableGen's Multi line string starts with [{
- if (Style.isTableGen() && tryMergeTokens({tok::l_square, tok::l_brace},
-
https://github.com/mydeveloperday edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78996
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -276,13 +276,44 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::tryMergePreviousTokens() {
return;
}
}
- // TableGen's Multi line string starts with [{
- if (Style.isTableGen() && tryMergeTokens({tok::l_square, tok::l_brace},
-
@@ -276,13 +276,44 @@ void FormatTokenLexer::tryMergePreviousTokens() {
return;
}
}
- // TableGen's Multi line string starts with [{
- if (Style.isTableGen() && tryMergeTokens({tok::l_square, tok::l_brace},
-
https://github.com/mydeveloperday commented:
I don't use TableGen myself so I can't really say if this is quite the correct
thing to do, I feel it needs a TableGenTest.cpp example of real TableGen code
for every example you give here. Then we should try and cover the other use
cases. That we
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-format
Author: Hirofumi Nakamura (hnakamura5)
Changes
Adds the support for tokens that have forms like unary operators.
- bang operators: `!name`
- cond operator: `!cond`
- numeric literals: `+1`, `-1`
cond operator are one of bang operators but
https://github.com/hnakamura5 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/78996
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
12 matches
Mail list logo