https://github.com/sdkrystian closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` running on `ppc64le-lld-multistage-test` while
building `clang,libcxx` at step 12 "build-stage2-unified-tree".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/168/builds/86
chapuni wrote:
Reverted, thank you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1442,19 +1442,27 @@ SourceLocation
CXXUnresolvedConstructExpr::getBeginLoc() const {
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr::CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr(
const ASTContext &Ctx, Expr *Base, QualType BaseType, bool IsArrow,
SourceLocation OperatorLoc, NestedNameSpecifierLoc Qua
@@ -55,15 +55,21 @@ namespace PR11856 {
template T *end(T*);
- class X { };
+ struct X { };
+ struct Y {
+int end;
+ };
template
void Foo2() {
T it1;
-if (it1->end < it1->end) {
-}
+if (it1->end < it1->end) { }
X *x;
-if (x->end <
@@ -55,15 +55,21 @@ namespace PR11856 {
template T *end(T*);
- class X { };
+ struct X { };
+ struct Y {
+int end;
+ };
template
void Foo2() {
T it1;
-if (it1->end < it1->end) {
-}
+if (it1->end < it1->end) { }
X *x;
-if (x->end <
https://github.com/ldionne approved this pull request.
This patch isn't blocked by libc++, thanks for fixing the incorrect usage. This
isn't a review of the patch itself, just unblocking for libcxx-reviewers.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92957
__
sdkrystian wrote:
@erichkeane Hoping you can review this before your break!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1442,19 +1442,27 @@ SourceLocation
CXXUnresolvedConstructExpr::getBeginLoc() const {
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr::CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr(
const ASTContext &Ctx, Expr *Base, QualType BaseType, bool IsArrow,
SourceLocation OperatorLoc, NestedNameSpecifierLoc Qua
https://github.com/erichkeane approved this pull request.
Sorry this took so long! Apparently I'd left some comments without finishing
my review. Did another look through, everything looks good, just some minor
nits. Apply/merge at your convenience.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull
https://github.com/erichkeane edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -390,29 +390,37 @@ bool Sema::isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(const
NamedDecl *SD,
/// (e.g., Base::), perform name lookup for that identifier as a
/// nested-name-specifier within the given scope, and return the result of that
/// name lookup.
-NamedDecl *Sema::FindFirstQu
@@ -1790,24 +1782,25 @@ ExprResult Sema::ActOnMemberAccessExpr(Scope *S, Expr
*Base,
const TemplateArgumentListInfo *TemplateArgs;
DecomposeUnqualifiedId(Id, TemplateArgsBuffer,
NameInfo, TemplateArgs);
-
- bool IsArrow = (OpKind == tok::arrow);
+
@@ -1442,19 +1442,27 @@ SourceLocation
CXXUnresolvedConstructExpr::getBeginLoc() const {
CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr::CXXDependentScopeMemberExpr(
const ASTContext &Ctx, Expr *Base, QualType BaseType, bool IsArrow,
SourceLocation OperatorLoc, NestedNameSpecifierLoc Qua
https://github.com/mizvekov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92957
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -2923,10 +2920,9 @@ class TreeTransform {
}
return getSema().BuildMemberReferenceExpr(Base, BaseType, OpLoc, isArrow,
- SS, TemplateKWLoc,
- FirstQualifierInScope,
-
https://github.com/mizvekov approved this pull request.
LGTM save a few minor cleanups needed.
I think this patch has an incredible amount of noise due to amount of cosmetic
changes caused by reformatting, specially due to changing parameters and such.
This is fine for now and I am not suggest
@@ -548,6 +575,7 @@ bool Sema::BuildCXXNestedNameSpecifier(Scope *S,
NestedNameSpecInfo &IdInfo,
// Perform unqualified name lookup in the current scope.
LookupName(Found, S);
}
+#endif
mizvekov wrote:
A left-over.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proj
@@ -390,29 +390,37 @@ bool Sema::isAcceptableNestedNameSpecifier(const
NamedDecl *SD,
/// (e.g., Base::), perform name lookup for that identifier as a
/// nested-name-specifier within the given scope, and return the result of that
/// name lookup.
-NamedDecl *Sema::FindFirstQu
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 93831c73ea51dcf4dc1832a4ea5616b819d36f31
babdee51c4a40a5053ed47846ff57bae2858a21b --e
20 matches
Mail list logo
