preames wrote:
Given the concern about breaking configurations w/no-integrated-as and older
binutils, can someone summarize here which versions of binutils are known to
work/not work after this change? This will likely become the key search result
for such breakage, and having it well
https://github.com/jacquesguan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95070
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/topperc approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95070
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jacquesguan wrote:
> We intentionally didn't do this because it makes LLVM not work with binutils
> that doesn't know about Zmmul. Maybe enough time has passed that it is no
> longer an issue?
Since Zmmul was ratified at june 2022, I think it's OK to update it now.
https://github.com/jacquesguan updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95070
>From dfbbcec9140f625309f78ca98c45b26b89fb71b1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jianjian GUAN
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2024 14:21:12 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV] Make M imply Zmmul
According to the spec, M implies
