https://github.com/benshi001 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/benshi001 approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
benshi001 wrote:
> For future reference, the avr16/avr32 devices do have SPM and SPMX features,
> but the current xmega3 definition has not.
>
> Xmega3 is also used for modern attiny series which do not have SPM(X), so
> that is correct.
>
> The avr64 devices use xmega2 which has SPM(X) defin
benshi001 wrote:
> @tomtor @benshi001 I just tried your latest revision on the top of tree, and
> both `check-llvm` and `check-clang` passed.
Thanks for your help !
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-com
kazutakahirata wrote:
@tomtor @benshi001 I just tried your latest revision on the top of tree, and
both `check-llvm` and `check-clang` passed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
ht
tomtor wrote:
For future reference, the avr16/avr32 devices do have SPM and SPMX features,
but the current xmega3 definition has not.
Xmega3 is also used for modern attiny series which do not have SPM(X), so that
is correct.
The avr64 devices use xmega2 which has SPM(X) defined, so that is al
https://github.com/tomtor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
>From 57a30b4bfd87a8389ab042b2c9184a59bf7f4519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Vijlbrief
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:59:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/9] Add support for many new AVR mcus like AVR128DB28
---
clang
tomtor wrote:
Double checking
https://onlinedocs.microchip.com/oxy/GUID-0B644D8F-67E7-49E6-82C9-1B2B9ABE6A0D-en-US-23/GUID-33953345-30E8-49BC-89A0-9734DC6EA5B9.html
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-comm
https://github.com/tomtor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
>From 57a30b4bfd87a8389ab042b2c9184a59bf7f4519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Vijlbrief
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:59:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/8] Add support for many new AVR mcus like AVR128DB28
---
clang
benshi001 wrote:
> manage to run these tests locally yet, but will figure that out.
This flang failure did not relate to your AVR patch, just omit it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm
tomtor wrote:
In the CI check I find one ` FAIL:`
```
2025-06-15T07:21:48.1250696Z FAIL: Flang :: Semantics/modfile76.F90 (3383 of
3529)
2025-06-15T07:21:48.1251772Z TEST 'Flang ::
Semantics/modfile76.F90' FAILED
```
but this is unrelated? (Flang, for
tomtor wrote:
@kazutakahirata Thanks again!
I noticed the failling check but could not find the cause in the enormous log
file. Wondered if it could be caused by a timeout on the build, but it was this
failing check.
Added new test patterns for the new MCUs.
Did not manage to run these tests
https://github.com/tomtor updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
>From 57a30b4bfd87a8389ab042b2c9184a59bf7f4519 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Vijlbrief
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2025 16:59:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] Add support for many new AVR mcus like AVR128DB28
---
clang
kazutakahirata wrote:
@tomtor
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/15653757180/job/44101995731?pr=144229
is showing:
```
/home/gha/actions-runner/_work/llvm-project/llvm-project/clang/test/Misc/target-invalid-cpu-note/avr.c:314:16:
error: CHECK-SAME: expected string not found in
tomtor wrote:
My local tree build OK...
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tomtor wrote:
> LGTM. Thank you for updating the patch!
Thanks! I am now rebuilding after:
`cmake -S llvm -B build -G Ninja`
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llv
https://github.com/kazutakahirata approved this pull request.
LGTM. Thank you for updating the patch!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi
kazutakahirata wrote:
@tomtor
> my local compile did compile my files, but ended with:
>
> ```
> cc1plus: fatal error:
> /home/tom/src/rust/llvm-project/llvm/lib/DebugInfo/LogicalView/Core/LVSourceLanguage.cpp:
> No such file or
> directory
> compilation terminated.
> [1758/5167] Building CX
tomtor wrote:
@Patryk27 @benshi001 @kazutakahirata
Oops, as you noticed I did not recompile after adding the avr64* models.
Sorry for that, changes are almost never trivial
Hope all is ok now, my local compile did compile my files, but ended with:
cc1plus: fatal error:
/home/tom/src/rust
https://github.com/tomtor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Tom Vijlbrief (tomtor)
Changes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143914 failed to compile due to an
unchecked late change. Sorry for that.
Added the missing XMEGA2 definition.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Tom Vijlbrief (tomtor)
Changes
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143914 failed to compile due to an
unchecked late change. Sorry for that.
Added the missing XMEGA2 definition.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project
https://github.com/tomtor created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144229
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/143914 failed to compile due to an
unchecked late change. Sorry for that.
Added the missing XMEGA2 definition.
>From 57a30b4bfd87a8389ab042b2c9184a59bf7f4519 Mon Sep
23 matches
Mail list logo
