llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-x86
Author: Jon Chesterfield (JonChesterfield)
Changes
Replace variadic functions with equivalent functions taking a va_list. This
composes with optimisations like inlining to give zero cost variadics.
Sched
@@ -1,5 +1,6 @@
// REQUIRES: aarch64-registered-target
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -target-feature +neon -emit-llvm -O2 -o -
%s | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple aarch64 -target-feature +neon -emit-llvm -O2 -o -
%s -mllvm -expand-variadics-override=disable | Fi
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 560c2fd3d427a5e2dc2361abde1142f3fda40253
15061bfbc2dc06de5bac32628389386cadaa5632 --
JonChesterfield wrote:
[inline-then-fold-variadics.cpp](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92850/commits/15061bfbc2dc06de5bac32628389386cadaa5632#diff-0a9893e04ae7e0a5692ad93dfb73d6efa992953f7e9eebb68c1a3f4acd457e1e)
is the motivating example for optimisation - simple variadic functions a
https://github.com/JonChesterfield closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/92850
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
JonChesterfield wrote:
Dropping this in favour of
[93362](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/93362) on risk assessment
grounds.
This commit enabled ad hoc testing from wasm, x64, and aarch64. However if it's
buggy, it'll show up on those targets, which should make the code owners
relu
