https://github.com/jacquesguan closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asb approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
asb wrote:
> > I think the conclusion from the LLVM sync-up call was that everyone happy
> > to move in this direction, so please add the release note and we can do a
> > final review. Thanks!
>
> Done, added release note.
Thanks! Sorry I wasn't specific about this, but we need a Clang releas
asb wrote:
I think the conclusion from the LLVM sync-up call was that everyone happy to
move in this direction, so please add the release note and we can do a final
review. Thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits maili
wangpc-pp wrote:
As @kito-cheng has pointed out, we should fix multilib issue before landing
this. It seems we don't generate multilib for ilp32f and lp64f in
riscv-gnu-toolchain?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits mailin
https://github.com/benshi001 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
benshi001 wrote:
I think this is reasonable, even I myself made such a change months ago in
Phabracator, but finally not approved.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/73489
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.l