We warn if it is just one occurance and next literal is not split too. I
changed test to test other scenario. I could add that test back, but I think we
have enough tests to cover code.
We should not warn for code pattern:
{
“a” “b”,
“c” “d”
}
> Dňa 9. 8. 2020 o 17:49 užívateľ Arthur
Hi Dávid,
Does this part of the patch imply that we *don't *want to warn on
"foo" TWO
? and if so, why not?
Anyway, I think at least
"foo" TWO
should be kept in the test suite, as a test-for-absence-of-warning.
TWO "bar",
- "foo"
Author: Dávid Bolvanský
Date: 2020-08-09T16:02:41+02:00
New Revision: 975467e4aa7ce1b8fcf4af0e25cdf053cfa8669e
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/975467e4aa7ce1b8fcf4af0e25cdf053cfa8669e
DIFF:
