Midar wrote:
Copied the necessary parts from CGObjCMac to just ObjFW, as GNUstep decided to
do it very differently.
Theoretically, the same could be done for the GCC runtime. Should it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126382
___
cfe-commits
https://github.com/Midar ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Midar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126382
>From ddc24b92cb8cc629082d0943de0f726a7604241e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Schleifer
Date: Sat, 8 Feb 2025 12:12:21 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] Allow direct dispatch for the ObjFW runtime
---
clang/includ
https://github.com/Midar edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Midar edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/126382
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits