https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
>From 1f7c6650f739092a1b8908de3793aa8bbdc7de34 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:16:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] D41416: [modules] [pch] Do not deserialize all lazy
temp
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
>From 270cdac974482a9852fa8c1bff517d444a5f51f2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:16:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] D41416: [modules] [pch] Do not deserialize all lazy
temp
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Rebased with main.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
>From be1c83fb885536c3e65657c6549bd20dd29d9649 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:16:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] D41416: [modules] [pch] Do not deserialize all lazy
temp
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
>From 2a9dfdab30467bef5361cea743be0dc215011685 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:16:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] D41416: [modules] [pch] Do not deserialize all lazy
temp
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
>From 59e1880df74434e3c446705788d92b5949d99536 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Vassil Vassilev
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 15:16:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] D41416: [modules] [pch] Do not deserialize all lazy
temp
vgvassilev wrote:
> Weird. I only see two failures in my local environment:
>
> ```
> Failed Tests (2):
> Clang :: Modules/cxx-templates.cpp
> Clang :: Modules/odr_hash.cpp
> ```
>
> And I saw both of them in my patch. It is simply order mismatches.
Ha, ok. I know that my system constantly
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Weird. I only see two failures in my local environment:
```
Failed Tests (2):
Clang :: Modules/cxx-templates.cpp
Clang :: Modules/odr_hash.cpp
```
And I saw both of them in my patch. It is simply order mismatches.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
__
vgvassilev wrote:
> Personally I feel this patch is good and the testing result from our workload
> shows it is good too. But it looks like the performance testing results from
> google @zygoloid @ilya-biryukov is not good. So maybe we need to wait for
> landing this. (It will be great if @ily
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff 1ecbab56dcbb78268c8d19af34a50591f90b12a0
59e1880df74434e3c446705788d92b5949d99536 --
ChuanqiXu9 wrote:
Personally I feel this patch is good and the testing result from our workload
shows it is good too. But it looks like the performance testing results from
google @zygoloid @ilya-biryukov is not good. So maybe we need to wait for
landing this. (It will be great if @ilya-biryuk
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chuanqi Xu (ChuanqiXu9)
Changes
This from https://reviews.llvm.org/D41416. And we plan to introduce on disk
hash table based on this. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774.
Following off are cited from https://reviews.llvm.o
https://github.com/ChuanqiXu9 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/83108
This from https://reviews.llvm.org/D41416. And we plan to introduce on disk
hash table based on this. See https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/76774.
Following off are cited from https://reviews.llvm.org
13 matches
Mail list logo
