shraiysh wrote:
Sure I'll do that.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65243
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
kiranchandramohan wrote:
Can this have `omp.yield` as the terminator and be capable of
yielding/returning values?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65243
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/ma
shraiysh wrote:
`internal_region` sounds good. I did not want to make it highly specific,
because it could be used under other constructs too. Like, `omp.sections` could
have an internal region and a barrier in the future. We do not need it for
others at the moment, but not making it highly sp
kiranchandramohan wrote:
Please add a quick RFC in the mlir discourse channel.
Would it make sense to call it an internal region? Or specialize it further and
call it canonical_loop_region?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/65243
___
cfe-comm
