https://github.com/frasercrmck closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
frasercrmck wrote:
> Yes, the article you link to is highly relevant. Without this PR we're
> hitting the problem described in example #4.
>
> We can promote the issue to a build failure by choosing a custom command
> which can't run concurrently with itself:
>
> ```cmake
> cmake_minimum_requ
https://github.com/frasercrmck approved this pull request.
LGTM, thank you!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/tcreech-intel edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
tcreech-intel wrote:
Yes, the article you link to is highly relevant. Without this PR we're hitting
the problem described in example #4.
We can promote the issue to a build failure by choosing a custom command which
can't run concurrently with itself:
```cmake
cmake_minimum_required(VERSION 3.
https://github.com/tcreech-intel updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95018
>From 3e85695cc62abf8fe0943421708b5db67750b4ea Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tim Creech
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2024 11:07:55 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [libclc] Improve dependencies to avoid build errors
With
frasercrmck wrote:
Hmm, isn't CMake fun? Thanks for looking into this.
Unfortunately the file-level dependencies are there for a reason. With this
patch, if I `rm builtins.link.nvptx64--.bc` and build `builtins.opt.nvptx64--`
(with `ninja`), it builds the `link` target but doesn't actually reb
https://github.com/tcreech-intel edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/95018
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
