@Renato: What's your take on Ed's idea?
We use phab for all sorts of reviews, but it should be possible to figure
out which repository a review is intended to land on and add cfe-commits or
llvm-commits appropriately.
Although, for throw-away reviews, it might generate too much spam.
Cheers,
/
Hi Asiri,
2017-03-07 20:42 GMT+01:00 Asiri Rathnayake :
> Could you please always include cfe-commits as a subscriber in you phab
> reviews?
>
> We would like to be aware of these changes in advance before they land.
Sure thing! I'll try to do that from now on.
That
Hi Ed,
Could you please always include cfe-commits as a subscriber in you phab
reviews?
We would like to be aware of these changes in advance before they land.
Thanks.
/ Asiri
On 7 Mar 2017 6:27 p.m., "Ed Schouten via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> Author: ed
> Date:
Author: ed
Date: Tue Mar 7 12:15:52 2017
New Revision: 297174
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=297174=rev
Log:
Improve readability and correctness of the OS specific libunwind bits.
All of the access to __exidx_*, dl_iterate_phdr(), etc. is specific to
the findUnwindSections()