On 19.01.2017 23:43, Liu, Yaxun (Sam) wrote:
I think the supported extensions for a target should be as accurate as
possible, for it to be useful. Setting all
extensions to be supported on all targets will defeat its purpose.
I agree on the first part, but arrive at the exact opposite
n...@arm.com>
Subject: RE: PATCH: re-enable OpenCL extensions
As mentioned on cfe-dev as well, although it doesn't seem too critical it is
generally not logical to enable all extensions by default because most of the
targets don't even support OpenCL. But I understand your situation wit
mmits-boun...@lists.llvm.org] On Behalf Of
Kalle Raiskila via cfe-commits
Sent: 19 January 2017 08:03
To: cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Subject: PATCH: re-enable OpenCL extensions
Hi,
I noticed a change from clang 3.8 to 3.9, that it disabled all OpenCL extension
pragmas per default.
This broke pocl o
Hi,
I noticed a change from clang 3.8 to 3.9, that it disabled all OpenCL extension
pragmas per default.
This broke pocl on e.g. ARM for LLVM 3.9
(https://github.com/pocl/pocl/issues/409).
Example:
$ echo "#pragma OPENCL EXTENSION cl_khr_icd: enable" > hello.cl
$ clang -emit-llvm -x cl -o
