Hey Richard,
This change is tripping up a bunch of the bots:
http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-armv8-lld/builds/1397
I'm going to revert it so that we don't leave the bots broken overnight.
-Chris
> On May 16, 2019, at 6:46 PM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
> Author:
Sorry to do this, but I'm also reverting r360977, because it seems to be on top
of this one.
-Chris
> On May 16, 2019, at 9:58 PM, Chris Bieneman via cfe-commits
> wrote:
>
> Hey Richard,
>
> This change is tripping up a bunch of the bots:
>
> http://lab.llvm.org:8011/builders/clang-cmake-a
I did some digging before reverting. The bots your patch is failing on are
32-bit CPUs. It looks like your static_assert is assuming 8-byte aligned
pointers, so it always fails on the 32-bit builders.
-Chris
> On May 16, 2019, at 10:14 PM, Chris Bieneman wrote:
>
> Sorry to do this, but I'm a
; cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
Subject: Re: r360974 - Refactor constant evaluation of typeid(T) to track a
symbolic type_info
I did some digging before reverting. The bots your patch is failing on are
32-bit CPUs. It looks like your static_assert is assuming 8-byte aligned
pointers, so it always fai
has a 64-bit CPU.
>
> Douglas Yung
>
> -Original Message-
> From: cfe-commits On Behalf Of Chris
> Bieneman via cfe-commits
> Sent: Thursday, May 16, 2019 22:45
> To: Chris Bieneman
> Cc: Richard Smith ; cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> Subject: Re: r360974 - Refac
22:45
> To: Chris Bieneman
> Cc: Richard Smith ; cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
> Subject: Re: r360974 - Refactor constant evaluation of typeid(T) to track
> a symbolic type_info
>
> I did some digging before reverting. The bots your patch is failing on are
> 32-bit CPUs. It loo
