On 01/04/2016 01:40 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 5:03 PM, Richard Smith > wrote:
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Nick Lewycky via cfe-commits
>
Kostya, do you remember the exact original case in glibc for 22830 and
what glibc change fixed it?
I vaguely recall the case, but not enough to find the actual change
and compare it to the new scenarios.
I suspect that the original case was easy to fix because it was just
that the hidden_proto
Thanks for checking, Nick!
+Roland, FYI (recent changes in clang break compilation of all of the
glibc),
similar to https://llvm.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=22830#c1
On Mon, Jan 4, 2016 at 3:21 PM, Nick Lewycky wrote:
> On 01/04/2016 01:40 PM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>
I am now observing this error message when building glibc with clang (from
trunk):
../include/string.h:101:28: error: cannot apply asm label to function after
its first use
libc_hidden_builtin_proto (memcpy)
(many more instances)
Do you think this is a bug in glibc code, or the error message
On 12/17/2015 10:47 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
I am now observing this error message when building glibc with clang
(from trunk):
../include/string.h:101:28: error: cannot apply asm label to function
after its first use
libc_hidden_builtin_proto (memcpy)
(many more instances)
Do you think
On Thu, Dec 17, 2015 at 3:59 PM, Nick Lewycky via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 12/17/2015 10:47 AM, Kostya Serebryany wrote:
>
>> I am now observing this error message when building glibc with clang
>> (from trunk):
>> ../include/string.h:101:28: error: cannot apply asm