On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 5:50 PM, Richard Smith wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2016 6:28 a.m., "Benjamin Kramer via cfe-commits"
> wrote:
>>
>> Author: d0k
>> Date: Mon Mar 14 08:23:58 2016
>> New Revision: 263429
>>
>> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=263429&view=rev
>> Log:
>> [Frontend] Disable
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Evgenii Stepanov via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Benjamin Kramer
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:59 PM, David Blaikie
> wrote:
> >> Yeah - how are they relying on them in a non-asserts build anyway?
>
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 9:50 AM, Richard Smith via cfe-commits <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> On 14 Mar 2016 6:28 a.m., "Benjamin Kramer via cfe-commits" <
> cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
> >
> > Author: d0k
> > Date: Mon Mar 14 08:23:58 2016
> > New Revision: 263429
> >
> > URL: http
On 14 Mar 2016 6:28 a.m., "Benjamin Kramer via cfe-commits" <
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org> wrote:
>
> Author: d0k
> Date: Mon Mar 14 08:23:58 2016
> New Revision: 263429
>
> URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=263429&view=rev
> Log:
> [Frontend] Disable value name discarding for all sanitiz
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:55 AM, Evgenii Stepanov
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Benjamin Kramer
> wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:59 PM, David Blaikie
> wrote:
> >> Yeah - how are they relying on them in a non-asserts build anyway?
> (were we
> >> naming certain things regardle
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 8:48 AM, Benjamin Kramer wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:59 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
>> Yeah - how are they relying on them in a non-asserts build anyway? (were we
>> naming certain things regardless of +/-Asserts? (well, I know we were naming
>> some things, but mostly
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 3:59 PM, David Blaikie wrote:
> Yeah - how are they relying on them in a non-asserts build anyway? (were we
> naming certain things regardless of +/-Asserts? (well, I know we were naming
> some things, but mostly down in LLVM, I thought Clang generally used the
> IRBuilder
Yeah - how are they relying on them in a non-asserts build anyway? (were we
naming certain things regardless of +/-Asserts? (well, I know we were
naming some things, but mostly down in LLVM, I thought Clang generally used
the IRBuilder & thus didn't name things in non-Asserts builds))
On Mon, Mar
A long time ago I argued that the sanitizers should be using debug info
instead of alloca names for this, and I really thought that they had
implemented this... Is that not the case?
It is really bad that the sanitizers are relying on this stuff...
On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 2:28 PM Benjamin Kramer
Author: d0k
Date: Mon Mar 14 08:23:58 2016
New Revision: 263429
URL: http://llvm.org/viewvc/llvm-project?rev=263429&view=rev
Log:
[Frontend] Disable value name discarding for all sanitizers.
ASan also relies on names on allocas and will emit unhelpful output if
they're not present. Just force-ena
10 matches
Mail list logo
