carlosgalvezp wrote:
Thanks for the review and the info @thesamesam ! AFAICS the MPL issue is fixed
on trunk, targeting release 1.86.
About Pycuda, it's also stemming from MPL according to the build logs.
So it seems to me the solution to these projects is too "just" bump to the
newer MPL ver
https://github.com/cor3ntin edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102605
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/cor3ntin approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102605
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -7042,12 +7042,38 @@ void Sema::CheckCompletedCXXClass(Scope *S,
CXXRecordDecl *Record) {
}
}
+bool EffectivelyConstexprDestructor = true;
+// Avoid triggering vtable instantiation due to a dtor that is not
+// "effectively constexpr" for better compa
https://github.com/balazske created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
None
From 11e871ab17c119c71b8ef4bbcd3b186ec0e9a14f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Bal=C3=A1zs=20K=C3=A9ri?=
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 17:41:46 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] [clang][analyzer] Bring checker alpha
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst (+16-16)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/StaticAnalyzer/Checkers/Chec
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-static-analyzer-1
Author: Balázs Kéri (balazske)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636.diff
3 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/docs/analyzer/checkers.rst (+16-16)
- (modified) clang/include/clang/StaticAnal
https://github.com/jansvoboda11 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/88326
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -569,7 +573,8 @@ class Expr : public ValueStmt {
/// Note: This does not perform the implicit conversions required by C++11
/// [expr.const]p5.
bool isCXX11ConstantExpr(const ASTContext &Ctx, APValue *Result = nullptr,
- SourceLocation *Loc =
cwarner-8702 wrote:
> There should definitely be a test in the clang side of things to ensure
> correct handling of the Expr::getIntegerConstantExpr method with this new
> parameter
100% agree. What would be a good way to verify handling of it when the flag
shouldn't the compiled output?
ht
DanielKristofKiss wrote:
/cherry-pick 9e9fa00
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -712,22 +712,30 @@ bool Sema::addInstantiatedCapturesToScope(
auto AddSingleCapture = [&](const ValueDecl *CapturedPattern,
unsigned Index) {
ValueDecl *CapturedVar = LambdaClass->getCapture(Index)->getCapturedVar();
-if (CapturedVar->
llvmbot wrote:
>/cherry-pick 9e9fa00
Error: Command failed due to missing milestone.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102629
>From 9b71b289feb75cdc6d67a6ac696ff0ba7969549d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 08:15:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-format] Fix a serious bug in `git clang-format -f`
With the
Author: Eli Friedman
Date: 2024-08-09T09:22:40-07:00
New Revision: 2f8f58dd17a11934e8c8ec212b6474f76fb18e61
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f8f58dd17a11934e8c8ec212b6474f76fb18e61
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2f8f58dd17a11934e8c8ec212b6474f76fb18e61.diff
https://github.com/efriedma-quic closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102553
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/jdenny-ornl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102521
>From 6546428805b52f1b6f350193ab08ff027892710f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Joel E. Denny"
Date: Thu, 8 Aug 2024 15:02:04 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/7] [Clang] Add env var for nvptx-arch/amdgpu-arch timeout
https://github.com/jdenny-ornl edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
ahatanak wrote:
I'll try to come up with an RFC for the qualifier today.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/100830
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
RSilicon wrote:
Who here can add milestones?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
RSilicon wrote:
> 9e9fa00
It has a merge conflict too, but one that is trivial so I can make my own PR.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/lis
RSilicon wrote:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102646
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101978
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Harini0924 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
…t Variables
This patch updates the llvm-lit clang tests by replacing shell command
substitutions with lit-compatible syntax for setting and referencing
environment variables. Specifically, the use of shell
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: None (Harini0924)
Changes
…t Variables
This patch updates the llvm-lit clang tests by replacing shell command
substitutions with lit-compatible syntax for setting and referencing
environment variables. Specifically, the use of she
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: None (Harini0924)
Changes
…t Variables
This patch updates the llvm-lit clang tests by replacing shell command
substitutions with lit-compatible syntax for setting and referencing
environment variables. Specifically, the use of shell-styl
https://github.com/Harini0924 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Harini0924 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Harini0924 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/owenca updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102629
>From 9b71b289feb75cdc6d67a6ac696ff0ba7969549d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Owen Pan
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 08:15:43 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [clang-format] Fix a serious bug in `git clang-format -f`
With the
https://github.com/Harini0924 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
>From 658af04b25dfdb00d418936d576d13f301ffe0e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Harini
Date: Tue, 6 Aug 2024 04:40:30 +
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [llvm-lit] Replace Shell Substitutions with lit Syntax
for Envir
https://github.com/Harini0924 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/smeenai created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102648
The idea is that the output of `hmaptool dump --json` can be fed
directly back to `hmaptool write` for easy round-tripping.
>From 140a930607b34d2795defee00bbac59baf4c23c5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Shoaib M
Harini0924 wrote:
CC: @ilovepi @petrhosek
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Harini0924 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Shoaib Meenai (smeenai)
Changes
The idea is that the output of `hmaptool dump --json` can be fed
directly back to `hmaptool write` for easy round-tripping.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102648.diff
1 Files Aff
https://github.com/Harini0924 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
So the idea here is that if the struct in question uses counted_by, you
automatically set the count... and if, for whatever reason, the compiler can't
find the corresponding field, you just throw away the count? That seems like
an terrifying API; it's impossible to predic
asl wrote:
> Was there an RFC for this? I ask because it's introducing another qualifier
> and that has broad impacts on things beyond Clang like libc++, etc so we
> really need buy-in from a wider range of the community than will likely see
> this PR.
Just my 2 cents from downstream experien
Author: Joel E. Denny
Date: 2024-08-09T13:39:29-04:00
New Revision: 1ea0865dd6faf99ae25f22161c2aeb65ff9505c0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1ea0865dd6faf99ae25f22161c2aeb65ff9505c0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1ea0865dd6faf99ae25f22161c2aeb65ff9505c0.diff
https://github.com/jdenny-ornl closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jdenny-ornl wrote:
Thanks for the review.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102521
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
> @rjmccall sent an RFC for upstreaming pointer authentication work to llvm-dev
> in 2019, which mentions the `__ptrauth` qualifier.
> https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-pointer-authentication-for-arm64e/53433
>
> I don't think we sent an RFC for adding support for the `__ptr
bazuzi wrote:
Any additional questions on this @mizvekov?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102196
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102456
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
cor3ntin wrote:
Nice tests, thanks. Do you need me to merge for you?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102196
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -50,6 +101,44 @@ class BuiltinFunctionChecker : public Checker {
} // namespace
+void BuiltinFunctionChecker::HandleOverflowBuiltin(const CallEvent &Call,
+ CheckerContext &C,
+
https://github.com/ccotter updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101450
>From f7e7681db6ad83878fd00cf250047c98b1b4f051 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Cotter
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:30:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Add support for bsl::optional
---
clang-tools-
@@ -386,6 +386,10 @@ def __contains__(self, other):
# same file, in between lines
if self.start.line < other.line < self.end.line:
return True
+# between columns in one-liner range
+elif self.start.line == other.line == self.end.line:
https://github.com/ccotter updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101450
>From f7e7681db6ad83878fd00cf250047c98b1b4f051 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Cotter
Date: Tue, 23 Jul 2024 10:30:54 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang-tidy] Add support for bsl::optional
---
clang-tools-
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
steakhal wrote:
Have you checked the quality of the reports?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102636
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/ahmedbougacha updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102416
>From 41061b347b7d0fa862f65896d4fc155cb0b791ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 20:24:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang] Wire -fptrauth-returns to "ptrauth-returns" f
@@ -87,12 +87,13 @@
/// -gcc has lowest priority so -gcc
/// on PATH beats default triple in program path
-// RUN: DEFAULT_TRIPLE=`%t/clang --version | grep "Target:" | cut -d ' ' -f2`
-// RUN: touch %t/$DEFAULT_TRIPLE-gcc && chmod +x %t/$DEFAULT_TRIPLE-gcc
-// RUN: touch %t/%
@@ -87,12 +87,13 @@
/// -gcc has lowest priority so -gcc
/// on PATH beats default triple in program path
-// RUN: DEFAULT_TRIPLE=`%t/clang --version | grep "Target:" | cut -d ' ' -f2`
-// RUN: touch %t/$DEFAULT_TRIPLE-gcc && chmod +x %t/$DEFAULT_TRIPLE-gcc
-// RUN: touch %t/%
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
LGTM.
Do you plan to apply more refactors to invalidation and Store?
I'm asking because currently we experiment with a complete Store rewrite -
touching there invalidation as well.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102477
_
https://github.com/s-barannikov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102006
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/s-barannikov commented:
A couple of remarks in case this patch gets reverted.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102006
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cf
@@ -293,20 +293,26 @@ void
CodeGenFunction::initFullExprCleanupWithFlag(RawAddress ActiveFlag) {
void EHScopeStack::Cleanup::anchor() {}
static void createStoreInstBefore(llvm::Value *value, Address addr,
- llvm::Instruction *beforeInst,
+
@@ -293,20 +293,26 @@ void
CodeGenFunction::initFullExprCleanupWithFlag(RawAddress ActiveFlag) {
void EHScopeStack::Cleanup::anchor() {}
static void createStoreInstBefore(llvm::Value *value, Address addr,
- llvm::Instruction *beforeInst,
+
https://github.com/ahmedbougacha updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102416
>From 41061b347b7d0fa862f65896d4fc155cb0b791ba Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 20:24:26 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [clang] Wire -fptrauth-returns to "ptrauth-returns" f
ahmedbougacha wrote:
> @ahmedbougacha Non-blocking nit: you might want to add a test in
> clang/test/CodeGen/ptrauth-function-attributes.c (like you have for auth
> traps in https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102417)
Oh yeah that's certainly required; I think I dropped it accidentally
Author: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: 2024-08-09T11:49:50-07:00
New Revision: 2eb6e30fe83ccce3cf01e596e73fa6385facd44b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eb6e30fe83ccce3cf01e596e73fa6385facd44b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/2eb6e30fe83ccce3cf01e596e73fa6385facd44b.diff
https://github.com/ahmedbougacha closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102416
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Artem-B created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102661
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101560
>From 6ee0add21bd2a9b25d28640c91de2fc6dab7fa72 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Belevich
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 11:51:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [CUDA]
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen
Author: Artem Belevich (Artem-B)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101560
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102661.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp (+
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Artem Belevich (Artem-B)
Changes
Fixes https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/101560
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102661.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/CodeGenModule.cpp (+3)
``
=?utf-8?q?Balázs_Kéri?=
Message-ID:
In-Reply-To:
https://github.com/steakhal approved this pull request.
I haven't really checked the PR, but we don't map the PointerSub checker to any
rules.
Maybe, after it's out of alpha we will come back and check if it makes sense
for us :)
Thank you wo
https://github.com/cjappl updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102622
>From 00d75e70c55e1e0c0b57a6402a9d02604a35dba6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Apple
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 14:25:44 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang][rtsan] Introduce realtime sanitizer codegen and
driver
@@ -845,6 +845,12 @@ void CodeGenFunction::StartFunction(GlobalDecl GD,
QualType RetTy,
if (SanOpts.has(SanitizerKind::ShadowCallStack))
Fn->addFnAttr(llvm::Attribute::ShadowCallStack);
+ if (SanOpts.has(SanitizerKind::Realtime)) {
+for (const FunctionEffectWithCon
bazuzi wrote:
Yes, thanks!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102196
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
jakeegan wrote:
Thanks for the build fix! However we are now seeing a test failure that seems
to be related
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/64/builds/643/steps/6/logs/FAIL__LLVM-Unit__DynamicLibraryTests_DynamicLibrar
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102396
___
Author: Samira Bazuzi
Date: 2024-08-09T21:09:55+02:00
New Revision: e5697d7f99b441064a4e4c3c27c2fc8e5d2784c0
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5697d7f99b441064a4e4c3c27c2fc8e5d2784c0
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/e5697d7f99b441064a4e4c3c27c2fc8e5d2784c0.diff
https://github.com/cor3ntin closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102196
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/Artem-B updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102661
>From 0f3944e1c12baa958f52c3c015a0cf5f9aeff1ed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Artem Belevich
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 11:51:23 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [CUDA] Emit used function list in deterministic order.
Fixes ht
yuxuanchen1997 wrote:
A noob question but I wanted to make sure that this patch actually intended to
reject program like this one?
```
#include
#include
class K {
public:
template
K(const std::vector& v) {
static_assert(!std::is_same::value, "Error!");
}
};
void foo(std::vector&
https://github.com/egorzhdan created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102664
This allows adding a Clang attribute
`swift_attr("conforms_to:ModuleName.ProtocolName")` to C++ structs via API
Notes.
The Swift compiler respects this attribute when importing C++ types into Swift
by autom
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Egor Zhdan (egorzhdan)
Changes
This allows adding a Clang attribute
`swift_attr("conforms_to:ModuleName.ProtocolName")` to C++ structs via API
Notes.
The Swift compiler respects this attribute when importing C++ types into Swift
by auto
VolatileAcorn wrote:
> If adding Leave is not trivial, we can support it in another patch.
I couldn't see a simple way to implement Leave, but it's possible I've missed
something.
> Have you given any thought about [#53190
> (comment)](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/53190#issueco
VolatileAcorn wrote:
> Whilst I can understand BinPackParameters being deprecated, as its one of the
> original options I do worry a little about just how much impact such a
> deprecation might have... it needs to be completely seemless because there is
> ALOT of documentation references to it
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff fb7028237bac1dccd328b6c3150e50e222a0879b
32d62daa94c30b1ddf95fc78e48866c8d4633bbb --e
https://github.com/ahmedbougacha updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102417
>From 241ecf478c0cc0e929ffef3532cc2cb625781a71 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: Fri, 9 Aug 2024 12:26:20 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] [clang] Enable pointer authentication auth-failure traps.
Author: Ahmed Bougacha
Date: 2024-08-09T12:32:01-07:00
New Revision: d179acd0484bac30c5ebbbed4d29a4734d92ac93
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d179acd0484bac30c5ebbbed4d29a4734d92ac93
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/d179acd0484bac30c5ebbbed4d29a4734d92ac93.diff
https://github.com/ahmedbougacha closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
asl wrote:
/cherry-pick 2eb6e30fe83ccce3cf01e596e73fa6385facd44b
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102416
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asl milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102416
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
asl wrote:
/cherry-pick d179acd0484bac30c5ebbbed4d29a4734d92ac93
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/asl milestoned
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102417
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
/pull-request llvm/llvm-project#102670
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102416
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
Failed to cherry-pick: d179acd0484bac30c5ebbbed4d29a4734d92ac93
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/actions/runs/10324823761
Please manually backport the fix and push it to your github fork. Once this is
done, please create a [pull
request](https://github.com/llvm/llvm-proje
cachemeifyoucan wrote:
@jakeegan I will create a PR to restore this target to the previous
configuration but it would be good to figure out what flags/setting were
different that caused that failure for you.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102396
_
https://github.com/tstellar updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/101344
>From a39c6d5e3decabab87ff9360851981123ff962d7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tom Stellard
Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2024 07:36:48 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/5] workflows/release-binaries: Enable flang builds on
Windows
https://github.com/steakhal edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102602
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/steakhal requested changes to this pull request.
Looks pretty good!
However, for this to land, we need to try harder to prevent state-splits.
We must prove in more cases (at least in simple symbolic cases) that no
overflow can happen.
But in principle, I like that we do a sp
@@ -21,16 +21,67 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -verify %s \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection
+
+#define NULL ((void *)0)
+#define INT_MAX __INT_MAX__
+
+void clang_analyzer_dump_int(int);
+
+void test1(void)
+{
+ int res;
+
@@ -50,6 +101,44 @@ class BuiltinFunctionChecker : public Checker {
} // namespace
+void BuiltinFunctionChecker::HandleOverflowBuiltin(const CallEvent &Call,
+ CheckerContext &C,
+
@@ -21,16 +21,67 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
+// RUN: %clang_analyze_cc1 -triple x86_64-unknown-unknown -verify %s \
+// RUN: -analyzer-checker=core,debug.ExprInspection
+
+#define NULL ((void *)0)
+#define INT_MAX __INT_MAX__
+
+void clang_analyzer_dump_int(int);
+
+void test1(void)
+{
+ int res;
+
+
@@ -278,6 +278,23 @@ int *mallocRegion(void) {
return mem;
}
+int *custom_calloc(size_t a, size_t b) {
+ size_t res;
+ if (__builtin_mul_overflow(a, b, &res))
+return 0;
+
+ return malloc(res);
+}
+
+int *mallocRegionOverflow(void) {
+ int *mem = (int*)custom_calloc(
@@ -21,16 +21,67 @@
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallDescription.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CallEvent.h"
#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/CheckerContext.h"
+#include "clang/StaticAnalyzer/Core/PathSensitive/Checker
201 - 300 of 418 matches
Mail list logo
