Author: Hervé Poussineau
Date: 2025-01-20T15:11:26+08:00
New Revision: 71d6287f5b1e65466de5fe5c093852fa7903cdbe
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71d6287f5b1e65466de5fe5c093852fa7903cdbe
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/71d6287f5b1e65466de5fe5c093852fa7903cdbe.di
https://github.com/HighCommander4 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121315
>From 6cd526368a02fa2cf2e764eee295d356f73c3c1a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nathan Ridge
Date: Mon, 20 Jan 2025 01:52:24 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] Upgrade HeuristicResolver to use QualType rather than
HighCommander4 wrote:
Rebased on top of #123549. (I forgot to set up the stacking properly, so the
commits from #123549 show up here too. They will go away after #123549 merges
and I rebase again.)
Confirmed locally that `Clang.Index/complete-memfunc-cvquals.cpp` is now
passing.
https://gith
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
Just a thought from my side, but not required at the moment because this aims
to be as simple as possible. Otherwise LGTM
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123551
___
cfe-commits mailing l
https://github.com/zyn0217 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123551
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -422,7 +425,15 @@ std::vector
HeuristicResolverImpl::resolveDependentMember(
if (!RD->hasDefinition())
return {};
RD = RD->getDefinition();
-return lookupDependentName(RD, Name, Filter);
+return lookupDependentName(RD, Name, [&](const NamedDecl *ND) {
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-adt
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Chandler Carruth (chandlerc)
Changes
**Note:** This PR depends on #123302 and #123308 -- only the
last of the three commits should be reviewed here.
---
Historically, the main example of *very* large string
chandlerc wrote:
> Some good news, everything seems to pass after your latest changes in this
> PR! I didn't believe it at first and did a clean rebuild and test to verify.
> In the end everything passed again.
>
> That being said, I am working on deploying an updated version of VS2019 to
> o
https://github.com/chandlerc created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123548
**Note:** This PR depends on #123302 and #123308 -- only the last of the three
commits should be reviewed here.
---
Historically, the main example of *very* large string tables used the
`EmitCharArray` to wo
@@ -191,4 +192,4 @@ int g = sfinae_me(); // expected-error{{no matching
function for call to 's
namespace NullExceptionDecl {
template auto get = []() { try { } catch(...) {}; return I; }; //
expected-error{{initializer contains unexpanded parameter pack 'I'}}
-}
+}
@@ -13464,6 +13464,14 @@ Decl *Sema::ActOnAliasDeclaration(Scope *S,
AccessSpecifier AS,
}
TemplateParameterList *TemplateParams = TemplateParamLists[0];
+// Check shadowing of a template parameter name
+for (NamedDecl *TP : TemplateParams->asArray()) {
+
kinoshita-fj wrote:
Because FUJITSU-MONAKA doesn't support FEAT_SPEv1p2, please remove it.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123336
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-comm
@@ -228,11 +228,8 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY FreeBSDTargetInfo : public
OSTargetInfo {
case llvm::Triple::arm:
this->MCountName = "__mcount";
break;
-case llvm::Triple::riscv32:
brad0 wrote:
Yes, I mentioned it in the comment.
https
@@ -228,11 +228,8 @@ class LLVM_LIBRARY_VISIBILITY FreeBSDTargetInfo : public
OSTargetInfo {
case llvm::Triple::arm:
this->MCountName = "__mcount";
break;
-case llvm::Triple::riscv32:
SixWeining wrote:
Do you want to remove riscv32 either?
Author: Alex Voicu
Date: 2025-01-20T02:30:29Z
New Revision: b08b56381cb4c24f37afba793dc872b6d721d9f7
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b08b56381cb4c24f37afba793dc872b6d721d9f7
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/b08b56381cb4c24f37afba793dc872b6d721d9f7.diff
LOG: [N
https://github.com/SixWeining approved this pull request.
LGTM for the LoongArch changes.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
Author: Brad Smith
Date: 2025-01-19T22:23:11-05:00
New Revision: 4294fe173e9696a4c090857fa0766cd44c1964dc
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4294fe173e9696a4c090857fa0766cd44c1964dc
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/4294fe173e9696a4c090857fa0766cd44c1964dc.diff
LO
https://github.com/brad0 closed https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122515
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/leijurv updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/118046
>From 1caf823165b16f6701993d586df51d5cdbf0885e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Leijurv
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2024 21:54:36 -0600
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [clang-format] Add BreakBeforeTemplateClose option
---
clang/d
haopliu wrote:
Thanks for reporting this crash and the fixing, @fhahn!
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117104
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
HighCommander4 wrote:
> This made me realize that `HeuristicResolver::getPointeeType()` actually has
> a deficiency where it incorrectly discards the cv-qualifiers of the returned
> pointee type. I'll fix that in a dependent patch before proceeding with this.
Filed https://github.com/llvm/llvm
HighCommander4 wrote:
I don't really have enough experience with the AST matcher implementations to
provide an authoritative review of this, sorry.
I did do some digging in the code history, and found that `TypeLocTypeMatcher`
did store a `Matcher` in the past. That was changed in
https://git
https://github.com/AlexVlx closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/123519
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/chandlerc edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/122873
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder
`openmp-offload-libc-amdgpu-runtime` running on `omp-vega20-1` while building
`clang` at step 7 "Add check check-offload".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/73/builds/11996
Here is the r
cor3ntin wrote:
> I don't think that's actually intended though.
Are you saying we should open a LWG issue?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/91070
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/
jroelofs wrote:
cc @ian-twilightcoder
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/117243
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
101 - 127 of 127 matches
Mail list logo
