@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -fsyntax-only %s -verify=c -std=c11
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -fsyntax-only %s -pedantic -verify=c-pedantic -std=c11
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
//
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -fsyntax-on
https://github.com/zyn0217 approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150559
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/zyn0217 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139066
>From a6ee1af04225063bab4d853611c7a57b1db37aa9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Younan Zhang
Date: Thu, 8 May 2025 19:42:51 +0800
Subject: [PATCH 1/4] [Clang] Do not eat SFINAE diagnostics for explicit
template a
https://github.com/vbvictor approved this pull request.
LGTM, please rebase on latest main, ReleaseNotes were cleared after 21th
release. After that, could be merged.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139474
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-co
tbaederr wrote:
This breaks a bunch of libc++ tests in its current form.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150407
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
4vtomat wrote:
> Please can you add a LLVM IR test for `llc`?
Yeah sure!
> I don't think I know enough about the "fixed vectors in scalable vectors"
> lowering to know if `splitValueIntoRegisterParts` and
> `joinRegisterPartsIntoValue` are correct but they don't seem so wrong at a
> glance.
@@ -1,22 +1,22 @@
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple spir64-unknown-unknown-sycldevice -fsycl-is-device
-disable-llvm-passes -emit-llvm %s -o - | FileCheck %s
-// CHECK: @[[LAMBDA_KERNEL3:[^\w]+]] = private unnamed_addr addrspace(1)
constant [[LAMBDA_K3_SIZE:\[[0-9]+ x i8\]]] c"_ZTSZ4m
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// REQUIRES: riscv-registered-target
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv32 -target-feature +v \
+// RUN: -mvscale-min=2 -mvscale-max=2 -O2 -emit-llvm %s -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -target-feature +v \
+// RUN: -
@@ -0,0 +1,39 @@
+// REQUIRES: riscv-registered-target
+
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv32 -target-feature +v \
+// RUN: -mvscale-min=2 -mvscale-max=2 -O2 -emit-llvm %s -o - \
+// RUN: | FileCheck %s
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple riscv64 -target-feature +v \
+// RUN: -
@@ -3,8 +3,8 @@
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -fsyntax-only %s -verify=c -std=c11
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c -fsyntax-only %s -pedantic -verify=c-pedantic -std=c11
-fexperimental-new-constant-interpreter
//
-// RUN: %clang_cc1 -x c++ -fsyntax-on
jj-marr wrote:
I broke my Gentoo installation during a system update so I haven't been able to
work on this PR.
TBD on when it'll be fixed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146970
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https
https://github.com/Ritanya-B-Bharadwaj updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/135807
>From 9c56e59ba9984c14c15a8d5a95a02e7192a64e8f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ritanya B Bharadwaj
Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2025 09:33:06 -0500
Subject: [PATCH 01/11] [OpenMP] Parsing Support of ThreadSets in
@@ -11664,6 +11664,17 @@ def note_omp_implicit_dsa : Note<
"implicitly determined as %0">;
def err_omp_loop_var_dsa : Error<
"loop iteration variable in the associated loop of 'omp %1' directive may
not be %0, predetermined as %2">;
+def err_omp_not_canonical_loop : Error<
@@ -11664,6 +11664,17 @@ def note_omp_implicit_dsa : Note<
"implicitly determined as %0">;
def err_omp_loop_var_dsa : Error<
"loop iteration variable in the associated loop of 'omp %1' directive may
not be %0, predetermined as %2">;
+def err_omp_not_canonical_loop : Error<
@@ -11664,6 +11664,17 @@ def note_omp_implicit_dsa : Note<
"implicitly determined as %0">;
def err_omp_loop_var_dsa : Error<
"loop iteration variable in the associated loop of 'omp %1' directive may
not be %0, predetermined as %2">;
+def err_omp_not_canonical_loop : Error<
@@ -2162,6 +2162,10 @@ enum CXCursorKind {
*/
CXCursor_OMPStripeDirective = 310,
+ /** OpenMP fuse directive
+ */
+ CXCursor_OMPFuseDirective = 318,
alexey-bataev wrote:
```suggestion
CXCursor_OMPFuseDirective = 311,
```
https://github.com/llvm/l
Author: Erick Velez
Date: 2025-07-25T11:16:04-07:00
New Revision: 80594820512605f25993b28d0aab2214d5308d59
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80594820512605f25993b28d0aab2214d5308d59
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/80594820512605f25993b28d0aab2214d5308d59.diff
L
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150571
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -4981,7 +4986,7 @@ TemplateDeductionResult Sema::DeduceTemplateArguments(
Result = FinishTemplateArgumentDeduction(
ConversionTemplate, Deduced, 0, ConversionSpecialized, Info,
&OriginalCallArgs, /*PartialOverloading=*/false,
-/*PartialOrdering=*/
https://github.com/evelez7 edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150670
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -1479,7 +1492,109 @@ class SemaOpenMP : public SemaBase {
bool checkTransformableLoopNest(
OpenMPDirectiveKind Kind, Stmt *AStmt, int NumLoops,
SmallVectorImpl &LoopHelpers,
- Stmt *&Body, SmallVectorImpl> &OriginalInits);
+ Stmt *&Body, SmallVectorIm
@@ -3256,9 +3256,8 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitDeclRefLValue(const
DeclRefExpr *E) {
var, ConvertTypeForMem(VD->getType()),
getContext().getDeclAlign(VD));
// No other cases for now.
-} else {
+} else
alexey-bataev wrote:
Restore br
https://github.com/usx95 edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150670
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-analysis
Author: Utkarsh Saxena (usx95)
Changes
Fix a crash in the lifetime safety dataflow analysis when handling null CFG
blocks.
Added a null check for adjacent blocks in the dataflow analysis algorithm to
prevent d
https://github.com/usx95 ready_for_review
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150670
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
>From cb68a058a60158d144af7395aa23346324687964 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:25:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] precommit return comments test
---
.../clang-doc
https://github.com/ilovepi approved this pull request.
Is the plan just to handle this for JSON and Mustache for now, and when we have
templates for Markdown (and whatever else) they'll just use this pattern? And I
guess migrate any tests we want to keep for HTML once we switch to the mustache
Author: Aaron Ballman
Date: 2025-07-25T13:24:00-04:00
New Revision: 479ae4aa8fe894dbb00a895b98620120c5e06769
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/479ae4aa8fe894dbb00a895b98620120c5e06769
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/479ae4aa8fe894dbb00a895b98620120c5e06769.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150662
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AaronBallman created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150662
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#147959
>From a413ff23ce599eb42a537460c3e240dfd58b87fd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Aaron Ballman
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 13:23:38 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] Revert "fix: replace repo
AaronBallman wrote:
Reverting the changes because these failures look related to the patch. I
*think* we're missing a call to `initSanitizers()` somewhere, possibly in
`SanitizerSpecialCaseList::create()`. I don't have the bandwidth to try to
debug it now, hence the revert.
https://github.com
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-support
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-driver
Author: Aaron Ballman (AaronBallman)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#147959
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150662.diff
14 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/AST/
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Aaron Ballman (AaronBallman)
Changes
Reverts llvm/llvm-project#147959
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150662.diff
14 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/include/clang/AST/ASTContext.h (-2)
- (modified) clang/inc
Author: erichkeane
Date: 2025-07-25T10:26:10-07:00
New Revision: 6cbcfb9a7cb79658c315732b1d7d86ce8a52bc45
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6cbcfb9a7cb79658c315732b1d7d86ce8a52bc45
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/6cbcfb9a7cb79658c315732b1d7d86ce8a52bc45.diff
LO
@@ -492,7 +522,8 @@ class FactGenerator : public
ConstStmtVisitor {
// Check if the loan is for a stack variable and if that variable
// is the one being destructed.
if (LoanPath.D == DestructedVD)
-CurrentBlockFacts.push_back(FactMgr.createFact(L.ID)
https://github.com/Xazax-hun commented:
Overall looks good but will want to have another pass. Added some random
comments most of which are probably not actionable at the moment.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149731
___
cfe-commits mailin
@@ -910,24 +961,129 @@ class ExpiredLoansAnalysis
Lattice transfer(Lattice In, const IssueFact &F) {
return Lattice(Factory.remove(In.Expired, F.getLoanID()));
}
+
+ ExpiredLoanMap getExpiredLoans(ProgramPoint P) { return getState(P).Expired;
}
};
// =
https://github.com/Xazax-hun edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/149731
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -19,14 +19,35 @@
#define LLVM_CLANG_ANALYSIS_ANALYSES_LIFETIMESAFETY_H
#include "clang/Analysis/AnalysisDeclContext.h"
#include "clang/Analysis/CFG.h"
+#include "clang/Basic/SourceLocation.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/DenseMapInfo.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/ImmutableMap.h"
#include "
evelez7 wrote:
> Is the plan just to handle this for JSON and Mustache for now, and when we
> have templates for Markdown (and whatever else) they'll just use this
> pattern? And I guess migrate any tests we want to keep for HTML once we
> switch to the mustache implementation by default?
Tha
jeremyd2019 wrote:
> That said, I also encountered the same issue with BFD-ld (when building
> libc++ with @tyan0's patches from cygwin-packages), so I should try to
> reproduce it again to be sure. It may take a few days to rebuild and
> investigate...
What I saw is probably a bug in LLD, an
@@ -24,6 +26,48 @@ using namespace llvm;
using namespace llvm::dxil;
namespace {
+static const char *ResourceClassToString(llvm::dxil::ResourceClass Class) {
+ switch (Class) {
+ case ResourceClass::SRV:
+return "SRV";
+ case ResourceClass::UAV:
+return "UAV";
+ ca
https://github.com/dschuff updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150201
>From 6c3c8a1d43b3b06c6b38e8e3d2e00ef2dc5fbc4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hood Chatham
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 22:50:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/13] [WebAssembly,clang] Add
__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointe
@@ -218,6 +221,64 @@ Value
*CodeGenFunction::EmitWebAssemblyBuiltinExpr(unsigned BuiltinID,
Function *Callee = CGM.getIntrinsic(Intrinsic::wasm_ref_null_func);
return Builder.CreateCall(Callee);
}
+ case WebAssembly::BI__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointer_signature:
https://github.com/dschuff approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150201
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/AZero13 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150717
ObjCARCAPElimPass has been made obsolete now that we remove unused autorelease
pools.
>From 85d32f0a84881412ed782aedda8cea6f1fa17cd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Rose
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 19:01:43 -0400
Su
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: AZero13 (AZero13)
Changes
ObjCARCAPElimPass has been made obsolete now that we remove unused autorelease
pools.
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150717.diff
7 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/lib/CodeGen/Backe
https://github.com/HazardyKnusperkeks approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150658
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
efriedma-quic wrote:
Probably should release note, yes.
Also, can we try to land some of the changes separately? I mean, some things
can't land separately, or it would be a pain in the neck to land them
separately because of test changes, but we can at least merge the SelectionDAG
bits and t
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
>From 8e02cb5be5a006631177c76ced0f246b82b16745 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:25:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] precommit return comments test
---
.../clang-doc
Author: premanandrao
Date: 2025-07-25T15:21:30-04:00
New Revision: 8b7dc4cadb622e2b4a13155bffa5cec8c8fb6b8b
URL:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8b7dc4cadb622e2b4a13155bffa5cec8c8fb6b8b
DIFF:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/8b7dc4cadb622e2b4a13155bffa5cec8c8fb6b8b.diff
https://github.com/AaronBallman closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150559
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 reopened
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 closed
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -923,4 +923,129 @@ CIRGenFunction::emitArrayLength(const clang::ArrayType
*origArrayType,
return builder.getConstInt(*currSrcLoc, SizeTy, countFromCLAs);
}
+// TODO(cir): most part of this function can be shared between CIRGen
+// and traditional LLVM codegen
+void CIRGe
@@ -1208,6 +1208,16 @@ cir::GlobalOp
CIRGenModule::getGlobalForStringLiteral(const StringLiteral *s,
return gv;
}
+void CIRGenModule::emitExplicitCastExprType(const ExplicitCastExpr *e,
+CIRGenFunction *cgf) {
+ // Bind VLAs in t
https://github.com/andykaylor approved this pull request.
Looks good, with a few nits.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150668
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
@@ -923,4 +923,129 @@ CIRGenFunction::emitArrayLength(const clang::ArrayType
*origArrayType,
return builder.getConstInt(*currSrcLoc, SizeTy, countFromCLAs);
}
+// TODO(cir): most part of this function can be shared between CIRGen
+// and traditional LLVM codegen
+void CIRGe
@@ -923,4 +923,129 @@ CIRGenFunction::emitArrayLength(const clang::ArrayType
*origArrayType,
return builder.getConstInt(*currSrcLoc, SizeTy, countFromCLAs);
}
+// TODO(cir): most part of this function can be shared between CIRGen
andykaylor wrote:
```sugge
https://github.com/andykaylor edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150668
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
>From b3aed4f0786a7084908473985d796f21caf58436 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:25:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] precommit return comments test
---
.../clang-doc
https://github.com/AmrDeveloper updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150668
>From 2858cdcc7f217e59a5ebf6e6b6afbd3e9bdc6deb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: AmrDeveloper
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 19:49:11 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [CIR] Implement LValueBitcast for ComplexType
---
clan
@@ -1208,6 +1208,16 @@ cir::GlobalOp
CIRGenModule::getGlobalForStringLiteral(const StringLiteral *s,
return gv;
}
+void CIRGenModule::emitExplicitCastExprType(const ExplicitCastExpr *e,
+CIRGenFunction *cgf) {
+ // Bind VLAs in t
nikic wrote:
I've added a release note.
> Also, can we try to land some of the changes separately? I mean, some things
> can't land separately, or it would be a pain in the neck to land them
> separately because of test changes, but we can at least merge the
> SelectionDAG bits and the analys
https://github.com/evelez7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150647
>From d793f82c2f86568dbdb9005e18d4835158ac3c85 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Erick Velez
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2025 11:25:05 -0700
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [clang-doc] precommit return comments test
---
.../clang-doc
https://github.com/dschuff approved this pull request.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150201
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dschuff edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150201
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/dschuff updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150201
>From 6c3c8a1d43b3b06c6b38e8e3d2e00ef2dc5fbc4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Hood Chatham
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2025 22:50:08 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 01/12] [WebAssembly,clang] Add
__builtin_wasm_test_function_pointe
https://github.com/negativ updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146355
>From fc3b77d8c4b5dd264bd746ed997bcea6cddaf389 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrey Karlov
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 17:05:41 +0300
Subject: [PATCH 01/19] Initial implementation
---
.../bugprone/unchecked-option
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Serge Pavlov (spavloff)
Changes
When searching for noreturn variable initializations, do not visit CFG blocks
that are already visited, it prevents hanging the analysis.
It must fix Ihttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/150336.
-
https://github.com/spavloff created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150582
When searching for noreturn variable initializations, do not visit CFG blocks
that are already visited, it prevents hanging the analysis.
It must fix Ihttps://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/150336.
>Fro
github-actions[bot] wrote:
:warning: C/C++ code formatter, clang-format found issues in your code.
:warning:
You can test this locally with the following command:
``bash
git-clang-format --diff HEAD~1 HEAD --extensions h,cpp,c --
clang/test/OpenMP/target_update_strided_messages.
NimishMishra wrote:
> It's a pretty niche feature in the grand scheme of things, hence I thought it
> would be better to keep the code for it in its own file rather than all over
> the core lowering logic. Wasted CPU cycles are the thing being traded off
> here, but given that it is a niche fe
@@ -3706,14 +3706,19 @@ def fopenmp_relocatable_target : Flag<["-"],
"fopenmp-relocatable-target">,
def fnoopenmp_relocatable_target : Flag<["-"], "fnoopenmp-relocatable-target">,
Group, Flags<[NoArgumentUnused, HelpHidden]>,
Visibility<[ClangOption, CC1Option]>;
-def fope
s-watanabe314 wrote:
> I'm not sure the combined warning is necessary. I think just stating that the
> clang option overrides the GCC option is sufficient since there is no sense
> in which clang-specific options can be incompatible with GCC if GCC doesn't
> implement the option.
In this patc
woruyu wrote:
we can't use diagnostics in llvm-tools, so keep the overload function
`std::string &Error`, which is called by llvm-cfi-verify.cpp or CodeCoverage.cpp
```
LLVM_ABI static std::unique_ptr
create(const std::vector &Paths, llvm::vfs::FileSystem &FS,
std::string &Error);
//
@@ -5988,11 +5988,9 @@ bool clang::IsArmStreamingFunction(const FunctionDecl
*FD,
if (FD->hasAttr())
return true;
- if (const Type *Ty = FD->getType().getTypePtrOrNull())
hvdijk wrote:
This change looks like it should not be necessary for your mai
vhscampos wrote:
@egorshamshura This patch has caused a failure in libcxx tests:
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/150601
The failure only happens with a libcxx build without exceptions and RTTI.
Can you please have a look at it?
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/144220
llvm-ci wrote:
LLVM Buildbot has detected a new failure on builder `clang-s390x-linux` running
on `systemz-1` while building `clang` at step 5 "ninja check 1".
Full details are available at:
https://lab.llvm.org/buildbot/#/builders/42/builds/5495
Here is the relevant piece of the build log f
@@ -158,115 +172,85 @@ static bool isDeclRefExprToReference(const Expr *E) {
return false;
}
-void DereferenceChecker::reportBug(DerefKind K, ProgramStateRef State,
- const Stmt *S, CheckerContext &C) const {
- const BugType *BT = nullptr;
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150442
From 4403a6e50ba82d3d2cc4bb50f1cbc5ecf718 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:17:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] [analyzer] Conversion to CheckerFamily:
De
https://github.com/MacDue edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150592
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150442
From 4403a6e50ba82d3d2cc4bb50f1cbc5ecf718 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Don=C3=A1t=20Nagy?=
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2025 17:17:05 +0200
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] [analyzer] Conversion to CheckerFamily:
De
@@ -25,18 +25,22 @@ using namespace clang;
using namespace ento;
namespace {
+
+class DerefBugType : public BugType {
+ StringRef ArrayMsg, FieldMsg;
+
+public:
+ DerefBugType(CheckerFrontend *FE, StringRef Desc, const char *RMsg,
+ const char *FMsg = nullptr)
https://github.com/amitamd7 updated
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150580
>From 4b0be55b282fcd5482ef4f8b52cb07127501c254 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: amtiwari
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 02:45:34 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] support_for_target_directive_clang_unittests
---
clang/include/cla
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-backend-risc-v
Author: Jim Lin (tclin914)
Changes
---
Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150596.diff
1 Files Affected:
- (modified) clang/test/Preprocessor/riscv-target-features-sifive.c (+16)
``diff
diff --git a/clang/t
skatrak wrote:
I imagine we could fix the problem by removing the `-triple amdgcn-amd-amdgpu`
option from the RUN lines of the new failing test, or by adding a `!REQUIRES:
amdgpu-registered-target` if the option is needed.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150504
__
https://github.com/tclin914 created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150596
None
>From 18bf25a06939d3063121e88c3053899c4e09a9f5 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Lin
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 16:37:38 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] [RISCV] Add negative pre-defined macro test for XSfmm*
extensi
https://github.com/Mermen edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150390
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
vgvassilev wrote:
I'd wait to hear from @hahnjo before merging. Should not take too long.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150430
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commi
mstorsjo wrote:
> Weak symbols do not work out well in PE/COFF
They work just fine in clang+lld environments for mingw targets, but there's a
handful of known issues relating to them with gcc+ld.bfd, for mingw. But
apparently those issues don't hit cygwin targets.
https://github.com/llvm/llvm
https://github.com/aaupov edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150488
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/xlauko approved this pull request.
lgtm
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150293
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
AaronBallman wrote:
> > To be honest, I'm not entirely convinced of the value of having these
> > warnings in the first place. RenderFloatingPointOptions is already pretty
> > gnarly and hard to follow, and trying to capture what gcc would have done
> > based on its priority system so we can w
https://github.com/sdesmalen-arm created
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150592
Previously Clang would give an unwarranted error on the capture of '&a' in the
function below, even though the parent function and the lambda are both
`__arm_streaming` functions, when the target is compi
llvmbot wrote:
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang
Author: Sander de Smalen (sdesmalen-arm)
Changes
Previously Clang would give an unwarranted error on the capture of '&a' in
the function below, even though the parent function and the lambda are both
`__arm_streaming` functions, when the target i
https://github.com/NagyDonat edited
https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/150161
___
cfe-commits mailing list
cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org
https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits
https://github.com/NagyDonat commented:
I added some technical remarks in inline comments. If those are handled, I'm
leaning towards merging this PR, because it I agree that these warnings (where
the array would fit into the buffer where it's initialized, but the overhead of
the array new can
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+// RUN: %clang -fsyntax-only -Xclang -analyze -Xclang
-analyzer-checker=cplusplus.PlacementNew -Xclang -verify -std=c++17 %s
+
+#include
NagyDonat wrote:
These tests do not include real system headers (if I understand correctly, this
is becau
1 - 100 of 394 matches
Mail list logo
