[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation direcrive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -3223,6 +3223,8 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitDeclRefLValue(const DeclRefExpr *E) { // No other cases for now. } else { + llvm::dbgs() << "THE DAMN DECLREFEXPR HASN'T BEEN ENTERED IN LOCALDECLMAP\n"; + VD->dumpColor(); eZWALT wrote: Oo

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation direcrive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -5378,6 +5379,10 @@ class CodeGenFunction : public CodeGenTypeCache { /// Set the address of a local variable. void setAddrOfLocalVar(const VarDecl *VD, Address Addr) { +if (LocalDeclMap.count(VD)) { + llvm::errs() << "Warning: VarDecl already exists in map: ";

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation direcrive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -5790,7 +5805,11 @@ class OMPReverseDirective final : public OMPLoopTransformationDirective { explicit OMPReverseDirective(SourceLocation StartLoc, SourceLocation EndLoc) : OMPLoopTransformationDirective(OMPReverseDirectiveClass,

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation direcrive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -962,6 +962,9 @@ class OMPLoopTransformationDirective : public OMPLoopBasedDirective { /// Number of loops generated by this loop transformation. unsigned NumGeneratedLoops = 0; + /// Number of top level canonical loop nests generated by this loop + /// transformatio

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation direcrive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -962,6 +962,9 @@ class OMPLoopTransformationDirective : public OMPLoopBasedDirective { /// Number of loops generated by this loop transformation. unsigned NumGeneratedLoops = 0; + /// Number of top level canonical loop nests generated by this loop + /// transformatio

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation direcrive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

https://github.com/eZWALT edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation direcrive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

https://github.com/eZWALT edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation direcrive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

eZWALT wrote: I want to notify that the following week I'll be unavailable, so expect this patch to be updated on the 20th of May. Thanks for the feedback @alexey-bataev https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cf

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: It’s true that NumGeneratedLoops is used throughout the existing OpenMP loop transformation infrastructure. While in some cases its usage could potentially be replaced by NumGeneratedLoopNests (especially when only checking for values like 0 or 1), the two variables convey distin

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

https://github.com/eZWALT edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > @alexey-bataev It’s true that NumGeneratedLoops is used throughout the > existing OpenMP loop transformation infrastructure. While in some cases its > usage could potentially be replaced by NumGeneratedLoopNests (especially when > only checking for values like 0 or 1), the two

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -14175,27 +14222,350 @@ bool SemaOpenMP::checkTransformableLoopNest( return false; }, [&OriginalInits](OMPLoopBasedDirective *Transform) { -Stmt *DependentPreInits; -if (auto *Dir = dyn_cast(Transform)) - DependentPreInits = Dir->

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -11516,6 +11516,21 @@ def note_omp_implicit_dsa : Note< "implicitly determined as %0">; def err_omp_loop_var_dsa : Error< "loop iteration variable in the associated loop of 'omp %1' directive may not be %0, predetermined as %2">; +def warn_omp_different_loop_ind_var_typ

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -14175,27 +14222,350 @@ bool SemaOpenMP::checkTransformableLoopNest( return false; }, [&OriginalInits](OMPLoopBasedDirective *Transform) { -Stmt *DependentPreInits; -if (auto *Dir = dyn_cast(Transform)) - DependentPreInits = Dir->

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -1480,6 +1493,108 @@ class SemaOpenMP : public SemaBase { SmallVectorImpl &LoopHelpers, Stmt *&Body, SmallVectorImpl> &OriginalInits); + /// @brief Categories of loops encountered during semantic OpenMP loop + /// analysis + /// + /// This enumeration identi

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -1151,6 +1151,106 @@ class OMPFullClause final : public OMPNoChildClause { static OMPFullClause *CreateEmpty(const ASTContext &C); }; +/// This class represents the 'looprange' clause in the +/// '#pragma omp fuse' directive +/// +/// \code {c} +/// #pragma omp fuse loop

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

eZWALT wrote: Gentle-ping, I'm not sure if GitHub has notified you of the comments :) @alexey-bataev https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listi

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -962,6 +962,9 @@ class OMPLoopTransformationDirective : public OMPLoopBasedDirective { /// Number of loops generated by this loop transformation. unsigned NumGeneratedLoops = 0; + /// Number of top level canonical loop nests generated by this loop + /// transformatio

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -11516,6 +11516,21 @@ def note_omp_implicit_dsa : Note< "implicitly determined as %0">; def err_omp_loop_var_dsa : Error< "loop iteration variable in the associated loop of 'omp %1' directive may not be %0, predetermined as %2">; +def warn_omp_different_loop_ind_var_typ

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

https://github.com/eZWALT created https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 This patch is closely related to #139293 and addresses an existing issue in the loop transformation codebase. Specifically, it corrects the handling of the `NumGeneratedLoops` variable in `OMPLoopTransformationD

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > > AnalyzeLoopSequence > > Could you point, where this is located? Of course, [See line 14315 in `SemaOpenMP.cpp`](https://github.com/eZWALT/llvm-project/blob/main/clang/lib/Sema/SemaOpenMP.cpp#L14315) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 __

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > > AnalyzeLoopSequence > > Could you point, where this is located? Although now that i think about it, this function is not inside this PR but rather on the PR #139293, but the dependency is clear. https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 __

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: gentle ping @alexey-bataev https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

eZWALT wrote: gentle ping @alexey-bataev https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

https://github.com/eZWALT updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 >From affda91204c1aacdab8ebd0966a27e93feec6db3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: eZWALT Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 10:49:10 + Subject: [PATCH] Correct the number of generated loops --- clang/include/clang/AST/Stmt

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: After conducting an examination of the directive handling logic, I can confidently state that the number of generated loops (`NumGeneratedLoops`) does not affect the semantic checks for the majority of transformations. This is because values are usually hardcoded in the `ActOnXXX

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

https://github.com/eZWALT edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

https://github.com/eZWALT edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -1480,6 +1493,108 @@ class SemaOpenMP : public SemaBase { SmallVectorImpl &LoopHelpers, Stmt *&Body, SmallVectorImpl> &OriginalInits); + /// @brief Categories of loops encountered during semantic OpenMP loop + /// analysis + /// + /// This enumeration identi

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -0,0 +1,186 @@ +// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple x86_64-pc-linux-gnu -std=c++20 -fopenmp -fopenmp-version=60 -fsyntax-only -Wuninitialized -verify %s + +void func() { + +// expected-error@+2 {{statement after '#pragma omp fuse' must be a loop sequence containing canonical loops

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > It would be good to try to find the cases that may reveal this issues before > committing the patch Yes, i'll go through loop transformations tests and notify you tomorrow if this is the case, but i'm pretty sure that these are not breaking changes for the same reason that i t

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: Before leaving i can attest that the regression tests have been passed twice :+1: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/c

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > Are there any tests that might be affected by this change? Yesterday I ran all the tests (check-clang-openmp and check-clang) and no change in the behaviour or incidence was found, although i'll re-execute them just as a sanity check. Just a remainder but this merge request sho

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > > @alexey-bataev After conducting an examination of the directive handling > > logic, I can confidently state that the number of generated loops > > (`NumGeneratedLoops`) does not affect the semantic checks for the majority > > of transformations. This is because values are usu

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > What I see in the source code that it is used as a boolean flag. Can we > transform it to bool? There is no need to keep it integer Please could you cite the exact line? I'm not sure if you are refering to the logic inside checkTransformableLoopNest or not. https://github.com/

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > > > What I see in the source code that it is used as a boolean flag. Can we > > > transform it to bool? There is no need to keep it integer > > > > > > Please could you cite the exact line? I'm not sure if you are refering to > > the logic inside checkTransformableLoopNest or

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

eZWALT wrote: @alexey-bataev not sure what happened before with this build system, but now everything works as expected. Thanks for the fast replies and have a nice weekend! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing l

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -11516,6 +11516,21 @@ def note_omp_implicit_dsa : Note< "implicitly determined as %0">; def err_omp_loop_var_dsa : Error< "loop iteration variable in the associated loop of 'omp %1' directive may not be %0, predetermined as %2">; +def warn_omp_different_loop_ind_var_typ

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

https://github.com/eZWALT edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: I originally kept the `NumGeneratedLoops` information consistent despite being partially subsumed by NumGeneratedLoopNests (Note that its not actually the same, it returns the number of generated loops in total adding nested loops, but due to the current usage of this semantic i

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > I originally kept the `NumGeneratedLoops` information consistent despite > being partially subsumed by NumGeneratedLoopNests (Note that its not actually > the same, it returns the number of generated loops in total adding nested > loops, but due to the current usage of this sem

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: gentle ping @alexey-bataev @Meinersbur ;) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: gentle ping :) https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: > > I originally kept the `NumGeneratedLoops` information consistent despite > > being partially subsumed by NumGeneratedLoopNests (Note that its not > > actually the same, it returns the number of generated loops in total adding > > nested loops, but due to the current usage of

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

https://github.com/eZWALT updated https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 >From affda91204c1aacdab8ebd0966a27e93feec6db3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: eZWALT Date: Mon, 19 May 2025 10:49:10 + Subject: [PATCH] Correct the number of generated loops --- clang/include/clang/AST/Stmt

[clang] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Fix incorrect number of generated loops for Tile and Reverse directives (PR #140532)

eZWALT wrote: Thank you so much @Meinersbur ! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/140532 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

eZWALT wrote: > Thanks for the work and sorry I could not have a look into it earlier Nono, thank you for your time and guidance! Between today and tomorrow i'll upload the updated version, thanks for taking the time to improve it and the nitpicks! https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/13

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -1143,6 +1143,97 @@ class OMPFullClause final : public OMPNoChildClause { static OMPFullClause *CreateEmpty(const ASTContext &C); }; +/// This class represents the 'looprange' clause in the +/// '#pragma omp fuse' directive +/// +/// \code {c} +/// #pragma omp fuse loopr

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -508,6 +512,43 @@ OMPInterchangeDirective::CreateEmpty(const ASTContext &C, unsigned NumClauses, SourceLocation(), SourceLocation(), NumLoops); } +OMPFuseDirective *OMPFuseDirective::Create( +const ASTContext &C, SourceLocation StartLoc, SourceLocation EndLoc, +

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -3256,9 +3256,8 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitDeclRefLValue(const DeclRefExpr *E) { var, ConvertTypeForMem(VD->getType()), getContext().getDeclAlign(VD)); // No other cases for now. -} else { +} else llvm_unreachable("DeclRefExpr for Decl not

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -3256,9 +3256,8 @@ LValue CodeGenFunction::EmitDeclRefLValue(const DeclRefExpr *E) { var, ConvertTypeForMem(VD->getType()), getContext().getDeclAlign(VD)); // No other cases for now. -} else { +} else llvm_unreachable("DeclRefExpr for Decl not

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

https://github.com/eZWALT deleted https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

https://github.com/eZWALT edited https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/139293 ___ cfe-commits mailing list cfe-commits@lists.llvm.org https://lists.llvm.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/cfe-commits

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -1479,7 +1492,109 @@ class SemaOpenMP : public SemaBase { bool checkTransformableLoopNest( OpenMPDirectiveKind Kind, Stmt *AStmt, int NumLoops, SmallVectorImpl &LoopHelpers, - Stmt *&Body, SmallVectorImpl> &OriginalInits); + Stmt *&Body, SmallVectorIm

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -14189,10 +14196,49 @@ StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPTargetTeamsDistributeSimdDirective( getASTContext(), StartLoc, EndLoc, NestedLoopCount, Clauses, AStmt, B); } +/// Overloaded base case function +template static bool tryHandleAs(T *t, F &&) { + return false;

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -15499,6 +15836,496 @@ StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPInterchangeDirective( buildPreInits(Context, PreInits)); } +StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPFuseDirective(ArrayRef Clauses, +

[clang] [flang] [llvm] [openmp] [Clang][OpenMP][LoopTransformations] Add support for "#pragma omp fuse" loop transformation directive and "looprange" clause (PR #139293)

@@ -15499,6 +15836,496 @@ StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPInterchangeDirective( buildPreInits(Context, PreInits)); } +StmtResult SemaOpenMP::ActOnOpenMPFuseDirective(ArrayRef Clauses, +