"By having a chance to create something from scratch, it can
be built to be lean and spare, with all that is required and nothing
that isn't."
Speaking of that, I have some code here that implements basic bulletin board
functionality. It was only an experiment to test how DBIC::Schema works. I
wil
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:45 PM, Joshua Miller wrote:
> And "using the best tool for the job" is a common and widespread belief that's
> difficult to disagree with,
My point is that "best" can be defined different ways. David
enumerated the problems he was trying to solve. Those might be best
impr
I'm usually a lurker, but thought this was an interesting topic in a
more ways than just "let's make the website look nice". So anyway...
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Mark Fuller wrote:
> Even in the most contradictory case of a forum (or wiki) site using a
> different forum (or wiki), I think
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 3:26 PM, Lyle wrote:
> Look at www.yabbforum.com, it's a Perl forum script, but it's site is in
> php. I've contacted them about this before, to be told I wasn't the
> first to bring it up.
I agree with you guys. But, first it was loathing a Perl site that
uses PHP. Then it
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 4:26 PM, Lyle wrote:
> Mark Fuller wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Paul Miller
>> wrote:
>>
>>> If the website for it doesn't have some
>>> kind of demo and in fact uses mostly PHP code, what good is the lib.
>>>
>>
>> I understand your point and it has some val
Mark Fuller wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Paul Miller
> wrote:
>
>> If the website for it doesn't have some
>> kind of demo and in fact uses mostly PHP code, what good is the lib.
>>
>
> I understand your point and it has some validity. But, that's not what
> Lyle said, and I
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 2:31 PM, Paul Miller wrote:
> If the website for it doesn't have some
> kind of demo and in fact uses mostly PHP code, what good is the lib.
I understand your point and it has some validity. But, that's not what
Lyle said, and I was addressing. He said he "loathes Perl sit
On Thu, Feb 4, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Mark Fuller wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Lyle wrote:
>>
>> I personally loathe Perl sites that use PHP.
>
> I used to feel guilty about what others would think if they knew I
> edited Perl with a non-Perl editor.
I don't think the analogy is quite righ
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 5:20 PM, Lyle wrote:
>
> I personally loathe Perl sites that use PHP.
I used to feel guilty about what others would think if they knew I
edited Perl with a non-Perl editor.
I got over it. The result was better than forever talking about how
someone should write an editor i
> Cees is completely right. Many of us are very busy people and wouldn't
> have time to monitor a forum.
It's been mentioned a couple times already that most forum software
has RSS syndication and email notification.
The original topic was that David wanted more participation in the
wiki, particu
10 matches
Mail list logo
