@lists.erlbaum.net
Sent: Mon, September 27, 2010 10:37:15 PM
Subject: Re: [cgiapp] encoding pragma and CGI::Session
On Fri, Sep 3, 2010 at 8:31 PM, Ron Savage r...@savage.net.au wrote:
Hi Todd
Thanx for the sample code.
More below.
On Fri, 2010-09-03 at 09:08 -0700, Todd Ross wrote:
CGI::Session: 4.20
phases?
Todd
From: Cees Hek cees...@gmail.com
To: CGI Application cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net
Sent: Thu, July 29, 2010 6:48:34 PM
Subject: Re: [cgiapp] hook question
On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 7:58 AM, Todd Ross tar.li...@yahoo.com wrote:
I understand the distinction
Hello,
I'm playing around with hooks in CGI::Application and am running into behavior
that I don't understand.
Given this script (suitable to run from the command line):
[...@unixbox1:~] cat testcgiapp.pl
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
my $webapp = Private::Webapp-new();
to be processed at compile time, which seems
like the same phase they're processed in in my existing example. Why would the
behavior change?
Todd
From: Michael Peters mpet...@plusthree.com
To: CGI Application cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net
Cc: Todd Ross tar.li
Oops. Meant to send this to the list.
Is anyone successfully using CGI::Application::Plugin::ProtectCSRF?
Todd
- Forwarded Message
From: Todd Ross tar.li...@yahoo.com
To: Michael Peters mpet...@plusthree.com
Sent: Mon, July 19, 2010 10:48:30 AM
Subject: Re: [cgiapp] FormKeys / Nonce
Hello,
We're looking to increase our application security foundation by adding Nonces
to our HTML forms. A Nonce is a one-use token, generated with the form and
validated with the submission, that helps to mitigate CSRF (cross site request
forgery) attacks. A quick search of CPAN doesn't
It seems like CrowdSPRING or 99Designs might be appropriate for something like
this.
Todd
From: Paul Miller listm...@voltar-confed.org
To: CGI Application cgiapp@lists.erlbaum.net
Sent: Tuesday, August 18, 2009 9:17:19 AM
Subject: Re: [cgiapp]
Probably unrelated, I'm not really familiar with FastCGI, but this doesn't look
right to me:
my $sess_id = $self-param('sess_id'); // removed extra paren as others
pointed out
if (!$url_sess_id) {
$self-delete_old_sess($sess_sess_id) if $sess_sess_id;
What is $sess_sess_id?
Michael,
Ok, not instead of trying to use the toolchain to install Module::
Build and then
Apache::Test (if you answered yes at the prompt) I'm just going to be
really
dumb. If you have Apache::Test on your machine I will use it and run the
mod_perl tests as well as the CGI ones. Else I
I've seen quite a few posts on this list concerning
CGI::Application::Dispatch. I'd like to try it out. Installing it,
however, seems to be a problem. Since there is no README or INSTALL
included in the archive, I'm following the normal Makefile.PL (or
Build.PL) procedures.
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/22/2007 05:53:19 PM:
Thanx - but I assume you're being sarcastic :-(.
--
Ron Savage
I thought you put forth a very articulate post with solid reasons. Myself,
I like reading about Perl modules because I like expanding my arsenal of
techniques.
I'm enjoying
Lee Carmichael [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/21/2007 11:30:27 AM:
2. In my case, I only need error handling during prerun but while
I'm working on this, it wouldn't take much more work to update the
handling for the postrun hook. I could do this if anyone is interested.
Thoughts, Comments,
(
'error' = 'do_error'
);
# set the default error handler
$self-error_mode('do_error');
}
Then, in the sub modules:
use base 'SuperApp';
instead of
use base 'CGI::Application';
Todd Ross
-
Web Archive
Mark A. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 10/08/2006 02:24:57
PM:
Oh yeah. :) I've seen that before but it didn't register with me. I
just looked at the source for C::A and realize it wraps eval around
the execution of the run mode. So, doing what I suggested (put an
eval around the run
Perrin Harkins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/14/2006 07:58:01 PM:
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 20:13 -0500, Mark Stosberg wrote:
I definitely see a different result. I get just a blank page with this
test:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use CGI;
my $q = new CGI;
print $q-header( -status = '404 Not
Rob Kinyon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 08/03/2006 02:14:30 PM:
On 7/31/06, Todd Ross [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think CGI::Application's error handling would benefit greatly by
eval{}ing hooks. I routinely find myself executing code that might
die()
inside of a setup() routine
Cees Hek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 07/31/2006 12:01:39 PM:
Just a tiny correction (probably just a typo on your part since I
believe you wrote the original error_mode patch ;-) ). It only wraps
the execution of the actual runmode in an eval bock. It would be nice
if it would also catch
17 matches
Mail list logo
