* Ron Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-20 03:40]:
> my vote would be either for Object::InsideOut or Class::Std,
Don’t miss Class::InsideOut. It’s better than either of the
modules you mention for inside-out style. Unlike Class::Std it
actually works reliably, and unlike Object::InsideOut it d
* Ron Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-20 09:55]:
> since that module recommends [1] Object::InsideOut, what can a
> beginner do but follow the advice :-))?
“It is highly recommended if a more full-featured inside-out
object builder is needed. Its array-based mode is faster than
hash-based impl
Ron Savage wrote:
Adopting Rose required retraining myself, but after a very short while
it just went Click! in a powerful way. So I asked myself - why is that?
It's a feeling so it's difficult to articulate - but the word I now use
is familiarity. Writing DBI code in Rose feels just like writ
A. Pagaltzis wrote:
Hi
Don’t miss Class::InsideOut. It’s better than either of the
Sure - but since that module recommends [1] Object::InsideOut,
what can a beginner do but follow the advice :-))?
[1]
http://search.cpan.org/~dagolden/Class-InsideOut-1.08/lib/Class/InsideOut/Manual/About.po
Robert Hicks wrote on 10/20/07 7:12 PM:
I have been reading stuff on Rose recently. It is getting a lot of good
press from other Perl developers as well. I may try it in a new project
someday.
RDBO++
--
Peter Karman . http://peknet.com/ . [EMAIL PROTECTED]
# CGI::Application comm
Peter Karman wrote:
RDBO++
So here everybody is saying they like Rose better, and I'm learning DBIC :)
So, I'll ask, what do you think? How is Rose better than DBIC or vice versa?
The most comprehensive comparison I found is at
http://osdir.com/ml/lang.perl.modules.dbi.rose-db-object/2006-06/
Daniel Sterling wrote on 10/20/07 9:26 PM:
Peter Karman wrote:
RDBO++
So here everybody is saying they like Rose better, and I'm learning DBIC :)
So, I'll ask, what do you think? How is Rose better than DBIC or vice
versa?
I think it comes down to aesthetics, really. By that I mean that t
On 10/20/07, Peter Karman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think it comes down to aesthetics, really. By that I mean that the RDBO API
> design matched more closely the way I would do things if I were writing an
> ORM.
> I found I grokked the "RDBO way" more easily.
On that point I'll mention that
Hmm, I just saw this (catching up on my email, if you can't tell already
;)) after I replied directly to Robert's previous email on this topic.
I wanted to share that I'm using/enjoying Rose, too, but also that I
stumbled onto it and gave it a shot after reading Randal's columns on
the technolo
