Dear John,
> > We may just have to bail out of this feature if the two variables differ.
> Is it really the best way from UI/UX POV? Inconsistency isn't nice :-(. I'd
> like to try
> to have this feature either on or off for each repository.
You were right, it doesn't make much sense to split lin
Hey guys,
I'm in Greece then Japan traveling until the first week of July. I'll have
a few days in between to merge things, hopefully. Anyway, I'm here reading
your emails and patches.
Jason
___
CGit mailing list
CGit@lists.zx2c4.com
http://lists.zx2c4.
Dear John,
thanks for comments and tips.
> I think we should have a configuration option for this as it changes the
> behaviour. However, I'm not sure what the patch below does because...
Not a problem, I'll can add config value into v3.
> I'm guessing you intended to allow the repository at
Dear John,
Please, have a look at v2 (just minor cleanup), I'll answer there.
Kind regards,
Petr
___
CGit mailing list
CGit@lists.zx2c4.com
http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit
On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 10:37:29PM +0200, Petr Vorel wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel
> ---
> The only missing feature from gitweb: clickable any directory in between. It's
> very handy, if you have lots of repos (local AOSP repositories).
> If you don't like it hardcoded, I can prepare patch wi
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel
---
The only missing feature from gitweb: clickable any directory in between. It's
very handy, if you have lots of repos (local AOSP repositories).
If you don't like it hardcoded, I can prepare patch with configuration option.
v2: minor cleanup
---
ui-shared.c | 16 +
Signed-off-by: Petr Vorel
---
The only missing feature from gitweb: clickable any directory in between. It's
very handy, if you have lots of repos (local AOSP repositories).
If you don't like it hardcoded, I can prepare patch with configuration option.
---
ui-shared.c | 19 ++-
1
