On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 19:09 +, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> I am okay with keeping the vcs-git, but I don't have very high hopes for
> it before validator.nu recognizes it is a valid rel attribute.
What a validator does or does not do is pretty irrelevant.
> Seeing as how WHATWG is pushing Sche
I am okay with keeping the vcs-git, but I don't have very high hopes for
it before validator.nu recognizes it is a valid rel attribute.
Seeing as how WHATWG is pushing Schema.org language in itemprops ahead,
I suggest vcs-git to be replaced with Schema.org, e.g.
SoftwareSourceCode.[1]
On Thu, May
John Keeping wrote:
> we had a request to add support [1]
I was the one who requested it.
> Now, admittedly, vcs-git isn't registered there
...
> Anyone is free to edit the microformats wiki existing-rel-values
> page at any time to add a type.
I've now registered vcs-* on that pag
On Thu, May 12, 2016 at 6:16 PM, Paul Wise wrote:
>
> On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 17:51 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
>
> > Jusso has provided a patch.
>
> Do you have a link to the patch and discussion of it?
You can find it in the list archives.
___
CGi
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 17:51 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Jusso has provided a patch.
Do you have a link to the patch and discussion of it?
--
bye,
pabs
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
__
Paul has provided a link. Jusso has provided a patch.
It is now the time for interested parties to write their most eloquent
defenses or offensives regarding vcs-git.
___
CGit mailing list
CGit@lists.zx2c4.com
http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 17:47 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Are the two consumers listed in that document really the only two
> consumers out there?
Yes. Only one consumer is needed though.
> If so, I'm going to get rid of this.
Why? Please don't.
--
bye,
pabs
http://bonedaddy.net/pabs3/
Are the two consumers listed in that document really the only two
consumers out there?
If so, I'm going to get rid of this.
___
CGit mailing list
CGit@lists.zx2c4.com
http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailman/listinfo/cgit
On Thu, 2016-05-12 at 17:34 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> We added vcs-git per your request [1]. Now there's talk of removing it.
What are the reasons for removing it?
> Could you give full justification for its existence? How is it useful?
> What uses it?
The spec should answer all these
Hi Paul,
We added vcs-git per your request [1]. Now there's talk of removing it.
Could you give full justification for its existence? How is it useful?
What uses it?
Thanks,
Jason
___
CGit mailing list
CGit@lists.zx2c4.com
http://lists.zx2c4.com/mailma
On Wed, May 11, 2016 at 06:04:15PM +, Juuso Lapinlampi wrote:
> vcs-git is not a registered keyword. This microformat does not seem to
> be very popular and will throw errors in HTML validators.
>
> Because the element leaves us with no sensible rel attribute to
> use, there's no reason to ke
vcs-git is not a registered keyword. This microformat does not seem to
be very popular and will throw errors in HTML validators.
Because the element leaves us with no sensible rel attribute to
use, there's no reason to keep this.
For future consideration, microdata should be marked with Schema.o
12 matches
Mail list logo
